Arc A380 vs Arc A770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Arc A770M
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
39.80
+33.9%

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking98175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data14.11
ArchitectureXe HPG (2020−2022)Xe HPG (2020−2022)
GPU code nameAlchemistDG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2022 (2 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current priceno data$591 (4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed1650 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt (120 - 150 Watt TGP)75 Watt
Texture fill rate422.4131.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A770M and Arc A380 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz15500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 39.80
+33.9%
Arc A380 29.73

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A770M 11751
+88%
Arc A380 6249

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by 88% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A770M 37375
+169%
Arc A380 13892

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by 169% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Arc A770M 77403
+43.4%
Arc A380 53979

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by 43% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A770M 25563
+151%
Arc A380 10174

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by 151% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A770M 124487
+105%
Arc A380 60804

Arc A770M outperforms Arc A380 by 105% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+102%
47
−102%
1440p57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
4K37
+37%
27−30
−37%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 113
+41.3%
80−85
−41.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+14.8%
61
−14.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+38%
50
−38%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+32%
95−100
−32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+33.3%
65−70
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 95
+35.7%
70−75
−35.7%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+20.9%
65−70
−20.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+25.3%
75−80
−25.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+57.9%
76
−57.9%
Hitman 3 95−100
+35.6%
70−75
−35.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 176
+74.3%
101
−74.3%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+21.7%
80−85
−21.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+23.4%
75−80
−23.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 256
+172%
94
−172%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+32.7%
55
−32.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+40%
50
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+86.5%
37
−86.5%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+32%
95−100
−32%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+33.3%
65−70
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+40%
55−60
−40%
Far Cry 5 56
−14.3%
64
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+60%
30
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+66.7%
72
−66.7%
Hitman 3 95−100
+35.6%
70−75
−35.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150
+89.9%
79
−89.9%
Metro Exodus 95
+61%
59
−61%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+23.4%
75−80
−23.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
+130%
61
−130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 173
+162%
66
−162%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+52.1%
48
−52.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+141%
29
−141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+123%
31
−123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+33.3%
65−70
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+34%
50−55
−34%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+20.9%
65−70
−20.9%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+111%
57
−111%
Horizon Zero Dawn 105
+102%
52
−102%
Metro Exodus 85
+57.4%
54
−57.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+50%
34
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+192%
25
−192%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+23.4%
75−80
−23.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+37.5%
55−60
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+40.9%
65−70
−40.9%
Hitman 3 50−55
+26.8%
40−45
−26.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+39.1%
21−24
−39.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+34.4%
30−35
−34.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+41.9%
30−35
−41.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+45.2%
40−45
−45.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Far Cry 5 81
+55.8%
50−55
−55.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 82
+32.3%
60−65
−32.3%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+29.8%
55−60
−29.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+42.6%
65−70
−42.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+50%
35−40
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 39
−33.3%
50−55
+33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+41.7%
35−40
−41.7%
Hitman 3 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+45.7%
35−40
−45.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
+77.3%
21−24
−77.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+82.4%
30−35
−82.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+33.3%
35−40
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Metro Exodus 50
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+38.5%
24−27
−38.5%

This is how Arc A770M and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 102% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 43% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 37% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A770M is 192% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 33% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is ahead in 64 tests (97%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.80 29.73
Recency 30 March 2022 14 June 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 75 Watt

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A380 in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A770M is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 86 votes

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 728 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.