Arc 8-Core iGPU vs Arc A770M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A770M and Arc 8-Core iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc A770M
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
30.99
+67.2%

Arc A770M outperforms Arc 8-Core iGPU by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking184303
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.78no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameDG2-512Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2022 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40968
Core clock speed1650 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2050 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate524.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.79 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs256no data
Tensor Cores512no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A770M 30.99
+67.2%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.53

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A770M 37375
+202%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 12375

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A770M 77403
+99.1%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 38877

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A770M 25563
+199%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A770M 124487
+181%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 44226

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Arc A770M 10783
+229%
Arc 8-Core iGPU 3277

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
+161%
36
−161%
1440p54
+170%
20
−170%
4K39
+160%
15
−160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+135%
26
−135%
Cyberpunk 2077 113
+73.8%
65−70
−73.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+52.5%
55−60
−52.5%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+165%
23
−165%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+77.8%
27−30
−77.8%
Forza Horizon 4 256
+261%
71
−261%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+65.3%
45−50
−65.3%
Metro Exodus 100
+150%
40
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+48.8%
40−45
−48.8%
Valorant 120−130
+64%
75−80
−64%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+52.5%
55−60
−52.5%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+165%
23
−165%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%
Dota 2 58
+132%
25
−132%
Far Cry 5 56
+64.7%
34
−64.7%
Fortnite 140−150
+46%
100−105
−46%
Forza Horizon 4 211
+258%
59
−258%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+65.3%
45−50
−65.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+244%
25
−244%
Metro Exodus 82
+183%
29
−183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+40.9%
120−130
−40.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+48.8%
40−45
−48.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+81%
55−60
−81%
Valorant 120−130
+64%
75−80
−64%
World of Tanks 270−280
+23.9%
220−230
−23.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+52.5%
55−60
−52.5%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+84.8%
30−35
−84.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Dota 2 100−110
+71.7%
60−65
−71.7%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+35.9%
60−65
−35.9%
Forza Horizon 4 179
+289%
46
−289%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+65.3%
45−50
−65.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+40.9%
120−130
−40.9%
Valorant 120−130
+64%
75−80
−64%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60
+400%
11
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+400%
11
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4.8%
160−170
−4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+70.6%
16−18
−70.6%
World of Tanks 200−210
+57.5%
120−130
−57.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+60.5%
35−40
−60.5%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+68.8%
16−18
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+83.3%
12−14
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+95.9%
45−50
−95.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+183%
30
−183%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+66.7%
40−45
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+88.5%
24−27
−88.5%
Valorant 85−90
+89.4%
45−50
−89.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Dota 2 45
+400%
9
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+400%
9
−400%
Metro Exodus 37
+185%
12−14
−185%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+76.4%
55−60
−76.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+400%
9
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Dota 2 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Fortnite 40−45
+86.4%
21−24
−86.4%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+393%
15
−393%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+80%
14−16
−80%
Valorant 45−50
+105%
21−24
−105%

This is how Arc A770M and Arc 8-Core iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770M is 161% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770M is 170% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770M is 160% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770M is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Arc A770M surpassed Arc 8-Core iGPU in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.99 18.53
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm

Arc A770M has a 67.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc 8-Core iGPU, on the other hand, has a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770M is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Core iGPU in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A770M
Arc A770M
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 91 vote

Rate Arc A770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 53 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.