Arc Graphics 140V vs Radeon RX 6500
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 6500 and Arc Graphics 140V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX 6500 outperforms Graphics 140V by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 335 | 434 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Xe² (2024) |
| GPU code name | no data | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | no data | 24 September 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 8 |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | no data | 3 nm |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | LPDDR5x |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
| Shared memory | no data | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | no data | 12_2 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 55−60
+41%
| 39
−41%
|
| 1440p | 35−40
+29.6%
| 27
−29.6%
|
| 4K | 30−35
+42.9%
| 21
−42.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+41.8%
|
55−60
−41.8%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
+45.1%
|
50−55
−45.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+17.3%
|
52
−17.3%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+35.6%
|
70−75
−35.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+41.5%
|
50−55
−41.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−20.7%
|
70
+20.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+52.2%
|
45−50
−52.2%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+28.2%
|
110−120
−28.2%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+41.8%
|
55−60
−41.8%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 220−230
+28.2%
|
170−180
−28.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+52.9%
|
70−75
−52.9%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
+45.1%
|
50−55
−45.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+29.8%
|
47
−29.8%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+35.6%
|
70−75
−35.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+41.5%
|
50−55
−41.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 55−60
−1.7%
|
59
+1.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+53.3%
|
45
−53.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 40−45
+53.8%
|
24−27
−53.8%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+52.2%
|
45−50
−52.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
−21.6%
|
62
+21.6%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+2.9%
|
137
−2.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+41.8%
|
55−60
−41.8%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+52.9%
|
70−75
−52.9%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 70−75
+45.1%
|
50−55
−45.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 60−65
+38.6%
|
44
−38.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 75−80
+41.5%
|
50−55
−41.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 70−75
+52.2%
|
45−50
−52.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 50−55
+82.1%
|
28
−82.1%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+35.6%
|
70−75
−35.6%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+43.6%
|
90−95
−43.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+77.8%
|
18
−77.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+60%
|
14−16
−60%
|
| Valorant | 170−180
+53.5%
|
114
−53.5%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+55.9%
|
30−35
−55.9%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 40−45
+60%
|
24−27
−60%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+10.8%
|
37
−10.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+53.3%
|
30−33
−53.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+59.3%
|
27−30
−59.3%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35
+41.7%
|
24−27
−41.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+66.7%
|
9−10
−66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 27−30
+68.8%
|
16−18
−68.8%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+54.4%
|
65−70
−54.4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+64.7%
|
16−18
−64.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+60%
|
40−45
−60%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 18−20
+63.6%
|
10−12
−63.6%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+61.5%
|
12−14
−61.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+45.5%
|
21−24
−45.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14
−50%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20
+58.3%
|
12−14
−58.3%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 87
+0%
|
87
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Counter-Strike 2 | 85
+0%
|
85
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 42
+0%
|
42
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Valorant | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Counter-Strike 2 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
This is how RX 6500 and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:
- RX 6500 is 41% faster in 1080p
- RX 6500 is 30% faster in 1440p
- RX 6500 is 43% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 is 82% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc Graphics 140V is 22% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX 6500 performs better in 43 tests (70%)
- Arc Graphics 140V performs better in 3 tests (5%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (25%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
