Radeon 760M vs Arc A750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc A750 with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.

Arc A750
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
31.35
+110%

Arc A750 outperforms 760M by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking177354
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.16no data
Power efficiency9.5668.40
ArchitectureGeneration 12.7 (2022−2023)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameDG2-512Hawx Point
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 October 2022 (2 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584512
Core clock speed2050 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2400 MHz2599 MHz
Number of transistors21,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate537.683.17
Floating-point processing power17.2 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs11216
TMUs22432
Tensor Cores448no data
Ray Tracing Cores288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed2000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0Portable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 31.35
+110%
Radeon 760M 14.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Arc A750 12085
+110%
Radeon 760M 5766

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc A750 37288
+288%
Radeon 760M 9603

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc A750 98837
+200%
Radeon 760M 32985

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc A750 29667
+383%
Radeon 760M 6142

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc A750 130715
+213%
Radeon 760M 41767

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD108
+248%
31
−248%
1440p58
+205%
19
−205%
4K35
+119%
16−18
−119%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68no data
1440p4.98no data
4K8.26no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+77.1%
35−40
−77.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90
+260%
24−27
−260%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+184%
30−35
−184%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+156%
35−40
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+157%
40−45
−157%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+104%
95−100
−104%
Hitman 3 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+131%
75−80
−131%
Metro Exodus 144
+177%
50−55
−177%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+136%
40−45
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+230%
50−55
−230%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+70.9%
75−80
−70.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 106
+203%
35−40
−203%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+204%
24−27
−204%
Battlefield 5 140−150
+182%
50−55
−182%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+184%
30−35
−184%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+156%
35−40
−156%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+157%
40−45
−157%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+104%
95−100
−104%
Hitman 3 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+131%
75−80
−131%
Metro Exodus 143
+175%
50−55
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+136%
40−45
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 239
+443%
44
−443%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+153%
35−40
−153%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+70.9%
75−80
−70.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+176%
24−27
−176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+184%
30−35
−184%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+156%
35−40
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 90
−10%
95−100
+10%
Hitman 3 90−95
+224%
27−30
−224%
Horizon Zero Dawn 113
+46.8%
75−80
−46.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 199
+438%
37
−438%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+200%
23
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 63
−25.4%
75−80
+25.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+136%
40−45
−136%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+197%
27−30
−197%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+191%
21−24
−191%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+153%
14−16
−153%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 54
+350%
12−14
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+225%
16−18
−225%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+183%
18−20
−183%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+199%
80−85
−199%
Hitman 3 55−60
+222%
18−20
−222%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+197%
30−35
−197%
Metro Exodus 86
+219%
27−30
−219%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 145
+418%
27−30
−418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+256%
16−18
−256%
Watch Dogs: Legion 200−210
+119%
90−95
−119%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+204%
24−27
−204%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+245%
10−12
−245%
Hitman 3 35−40
+227%
10−12
−227%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+155%
75−80
−155%
Metro Exodus 80
+433%
14−16
−433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+393%
14−16
−393%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+211%
9−10
−211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30
+329%
7−8
−329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+263%
8−9
−263%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Forza Horizon 4 61
+205%
20−22
−205%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+460%
14−16
−460%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
+400%
6−7
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+186%
14−16
−186%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30
+0%
30
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Arc A750 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 248% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 205% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 119% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 460% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 25% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is ahead in 64 tests (89%)
  • Radeon 760M is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • there's a draw in 6 tests (8%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.35 14.96
Recency 12 October 2022 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 15 Watt

Arc A750 has a 109.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 760M in performance tests.

Be aware that Arc A750 is a desktop card while Radeon 760M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc A750
Arc A750
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 835 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 190 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.