GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Arc A750

Place in performance ranking	73	184
Place by popularity	not in top-100	45
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	21.73	37.72
Architecture	Generation 12.7 (2022)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	DG2-512	GA107
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)	2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$289	$179
Current price	$625 (2.2x MSRP)	$204 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3050 6 GB has 74% better value for money than Arc A750.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	2304
Core clock speed	2050 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	1470 MHz
Number of transistors	21,700 million	8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	70 Watt
Texture fill rate	537.6	105.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	242 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	16000 MHz	14 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	168.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	no data	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A750 43.83
+57.2%

RTX 3050 6 GB 27.89

Arc A750 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB by 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Arc A750 11954
+11%

RTX 3050 6 GB 10771

Arc A750 outperforms GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB by 11% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	102 +70%	60−65 −70%
1440p	61 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%
4K	37 +76.2%	21−24 −76.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	95−100 +53.2%	62 −53.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	140−150 +55.6%	90 −55.6%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +57.1%	140−150 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +47.7%	85−90 −47.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +49.5%	100−110 −49.5%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +51.8%	112 −51.8%
Hitman 3	140−150 +55.6%	90−95 −55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	300−310 +53.8%	195 −53.8%
Metro Exodus	220−230 +52.8%	144 −52.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	160−170 +56.9%	100−110 −56.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	400−450 +40.4%	285 −40.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +56.3%	96 −56.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	85−90 +54.5%	55 −54.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	110−120 +44.7%	76 −44.7%
Battlefield 5	220−230 +57.1%	140−150 −57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +47.7%	85−90 −47.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	160−170 +49.5%	100−110 −49.5%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +56.3%	160−170 −56.3%
Hitman 3	140−150 +55.6%	90−95 −55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	280−290 +56.4%	170−180 −56.4%
Metro Exodus	190−200 +49.6%	127 −49.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	160−170 +56.9%	100−110 −56.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	350−400 +46.4%	239 −46.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	290−300 +56.8%	185 −56.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 +53.8%	100−110 −53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +55.6%	45 −55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 +44.9%	69 −44.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +47.7%	85−90 −47.7%
Far Cry 5	140−150 +52.2%	90−95 −52.2%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +55.6%	90 −55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 +50.4%	113 −50.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	300−310 +50.8%	199 −50.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +44.9%	69 −44.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	95−100 +50.8%	63 −50.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

160−170
+56.9%

100−110

−56.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	130−140 +51.2%	85−90 −51.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +56.3%	128 −56.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +44.7%	38 −44.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	80−85 +48.1%	54 −48.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−105 +47.1%	65−70 −47.1%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +44.7%	76 −44.7%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +51.9%	79 −51.9%
Hitman 3	90−95 +55.2%	55−60 −55.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 +52.2%	92 −52.2%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +51.2%	86 −51.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	220−230 +51.7%	145 −51.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +49.1%	57 −49.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +50%	50 −50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+44.7%

75−80
−44.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +44.7%	35−40 −44.7%
Hitman 3	55−60 +52.8%	35−40 −52.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +49.1%	55−60 −49.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +47.7%	44 −47.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +44.9%	69 −44.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +42.9%	28 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +50%	30 −50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +53.8%	24−27 −53.8%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +55.7%	61 −55.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +55.2%	58 −55.2%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +53.8%	52 −53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 +50%	30 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+50%

40−45

−50%

This is how Arc A750 and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

Arc A750 is 70% faster in 1080p
Arc A750 is 74% faster in 1440p
Arc A750 is 76% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	43.83	27.89
Recency	12 October 2022	2 February 2024
Cost	$289	$179
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	70 Watt