Arc A750 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and Arc A750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4 GB
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
17.82

Arc A750 outperforms RTX 3050 4 GB by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking310178
Place by popularity25not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.5657.09
Power efficiency13.669.72
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA107DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 January 2022 (2 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 52% better value for money than RTX 3050 4 GB.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483584
Core clock speed1545 MHz2050 MHz
Boost clock speed1740 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors8,700 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate111.4537.6
Floating-point processing power7.127 TFLOPS17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs32112
TMUs64224
Tensor Cores64448
Ray Tracing Cores1628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI++

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3050 4 GB 17.82
Arc A750 31.71
+77.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3050 4 GB 6853
Arc A750 12193
+77.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−81.7%
109
+81.7%
1440p30−35
−96.7%
59
+96.7%
4K18−21
−100%
36
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.32
−25.1%
2.65
+25.1%
1440p6.63
−35.4%
4.90
+35.4%
4K11.06
−37.7%
8.03
+37.7%
  • Arc A750 has 25% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A750 has 35% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Arc A750 has 38% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 91
+0%
91
+0%
Elden Ring 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 285
+0%
285
+0%
Metro Exodus 116
+0%
116
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 76
+0%
76
+0%
Dota 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 239
+0%
239
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+0%
99
+0%
Metro Exodus 94
+0%
94
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
Elden Ring 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
World of Tanks 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+0%
86
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Elden Ring 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 43
+0%
43
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+0%
84
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how RTX 3050 4 GB and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A750 is 82% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A750 is 97% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A750 is 100% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.82 31.71
Recency 27 January 2022 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 225 Watt

RTX 3050 4 GB has 150% lower power consumption.

Arc A750, on the other hand, has a 77.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
Intel Arc A750
Arc A750

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2658 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 868 votes

Rate Arc A750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.