GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) with GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB, including specs and performance data.

Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
2022
4.43

RTX 3050 6 GB outperforms Graphics (Ryzen 7000) by a whopping 526% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking667203
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.13
Power efficiencyno data27.33
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2022−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameRaphaelGA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date26 September 2022 (2 years ago)2 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$179

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282304
Core clock speedno data1042 MHz
Boost clock speed2200 MHz1470 MHz
Number of transistorsno data8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology6 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data70 Watt
Texture fill rateno data105.8
Floating-point processing powerno data6.774 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data72
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data96 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data168.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−488%
100−110
+488%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Elden Ring 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Forza Horizon 4 17
−488%
100−105
+488%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Valorant 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Dota 2 14
−507%
85−90
+507%
Elden Ring 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Far Cry 5 23
−509%
140−150
+509%
Fortnite 24−27
−515%
160−170
+515%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−491%
65−70
+491%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−505%
230−240
+505%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−507%
85−90
+507%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Valorant 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
World of Tanks 70−75
−508%
450−500
+508%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−525%
75−80
+525%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Dota 2 37
−522%
230−240
+522%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Forza Horizon 4 9
−511%
55−60
+511%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−505%
230−240
+505%
Valorant 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Elden Ring 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
−500%
180−190
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
World of Tanks 30−35
−525%
200−210
+525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−500%
60−65
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Valorant 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Elden Ring 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−515%
80−85
+515%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Fortnite 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Valorant 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

This is how Graphics (Ryzen 7000) and RTX 3050 6 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6 GB is 488% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.43 27.73
Recency 26 September 2022 2 February 2024
Chip lithography 6 nm 8 nm

Graphics (Ryzen 7000) has a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 3050 6 GB, on the other hand, has a 526% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 254 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1410 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.