GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs Arc A350M

Place in performance ranking	344	536
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.63
Architecture	Xe HPG (2020−2022)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Alchemist	GK106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)	9 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149
Current price	no data	$251 (1.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	6	768
CUDA cores	no data	768
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	928 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt (25 - 35 Watt TGP)	110 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	55.20	59.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	no data	1,425 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Arc A350M and GeForce GTX 650 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	no data	PCI Express 3.0
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	One 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	86.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI
Multi monitor support	no data	4 Displays
HDMI	no data	+
HDCP	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	no data	+
3D Gaming	no data	+
3D Vision	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.1.126
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc A350M 14.17
+117%

GTX 650 Ti 6.52

Arc A350M outperforms GeForce GTX 650 Ti by 117% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Arc A350M 7147
+108%

GTX 650 Ti 3430

Arc A350M outperforms GeForce GTX 650 Ti by 108% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 +125%	16−18 −125%
1440p	17 +143%	7−8 −143%
4K	9 +125%	4−5 −125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27
+125%

12−14

−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35 +119%	16−18 −119%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +129%	21−24 −129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +138%	8−9 −138%
Far Cry 5	42 +133%	18−20 −133%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Hitman 3	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	20 +122%	9−10 −122%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +129%	21−24 −129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +131%	16−18 −131%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +129%	7−8 −129%
Far Cry 5	39 +144%	16−18 −144%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Hitman 3	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +139%	18−20 −139%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16 +129%	7−8 −129%
Battlefield 5	45−50 +129%	21−24 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry 5	37 +131%	16−18 −131%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 +138%	8−9 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Hitman 3	21−24 +120%	10−11 −120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +122%	9−10 −122%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14 +133%	6−7 −133%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	25 +150%	10−11 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +125%	12−14 −125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Hitman 3	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +150%	6−7 −150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3	0−1
Far Cry 5	12 +140%	5−6 −140%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +138%	8−9 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%

This is how Arc A350M and GTX 650 Ti compete in popular games:

Arc A350M is 125% faster in 1080p
Arc A350M is 143% faster in 1440p
Arc A350M is 125% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.17	6.52
Recency	30 March 2022	9 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	6 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	110 Watt