Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Arc 8-Core iGPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Arc 8-Core iGPU and Arc 7-Cores iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Arc 8-Core iGPU
2023
18.69
+9%

Arc 8-Core iGPU outperforms Arc 7-Cores iGPU by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking293315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXe LPG (2023)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameMeteor Lake iGPUMeteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores87
Boost clock speed2300 MHz2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory--

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212_2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 18.69
+9%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.15

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 12321
+4.5%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 38877
+0.7%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 8561
+1.3%
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Arc 8-Core iGPU 43978
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644
+3.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
+2.9%
34
−2.9%
1440p19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
4K14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+7%
55−60
−7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+13.2%
38
−13.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+6.4%
45−50
−6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+6.4%
45−50
−6.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+7%
55−60
−7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Battlefield 5 60−65
+7%
55−60
−7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+26.5%
34
−26.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+6.4%
45−50
−6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+5.8%
85−90
−5.8%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+6.7%
60−65
−6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+6.4%
45−50
−6.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−23.8%
52
+23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+7.7%
35−40
−7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+22.9%
35
−22.9%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+6.4%
110−120
−6.4%
Hitman 3 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 46
+15%
40−45
−15%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+9.1%
22
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+5%
20−22
−5%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+8.5%
90−95
−8.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+10.5%
18−20
−10.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+5.7%
100−110
−5.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100
+7.9%
85−90
−7.9%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+11.8%
16−18
−11.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Arc 8-Core iGPU and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 19% faster in 1440p
  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 8-Core iGPU is 26% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 24% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 8-Core iGPU is ahead in 45 tests (73%)
  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 16 tests (26%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.69 17.15

Arc 8-Core iGPU has a 9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Arc 8-Core iGPU and Arc 7-Cores iGPU.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
Arc 8-Core iGPU
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 16 votes

Rate Arc 8-Core iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 43 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.