GeForce GTX 760 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Ti GTX 670 GTX 680 GTX 680 Mac Edition GTX 690 GTX 760 GTX 760 OEM GTX 760 Ti OEM GTX 760 X2 GTX 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with GeForce GTX 760, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.71
+10.1%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms GTX 760 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU
GTX 760 GTX 760

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.53
Power efficiencyno data5.02
Architectureno dataKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameno dataGK104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)25 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81152
Core clock speed1278 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1033 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data170 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data97 °C
Texture fill rateno data99.07
Floating-point processing powerno data2.378 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Minimum recommended system powerno data500 Watt
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D-+
3D Gaming-+
3D Vision-+
PhysX-+
3D Vision Live-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−139%
67
+139%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.72

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Fortnite 70−75
+8.8%
65−70
−8.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
Valorant 110−120
+6.7%
100−110
−6.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+7.1%
160−170
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Dota 2 85−90
+7.6%
75−80
−7.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Fortnite 70−75
+8.8%
65−70
−8.8%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+8.9%
45−50
−8.9%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
Valorant 110−120
+6.7%
100−110
−6.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+9.8%
50−55
−9.8%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Dota 2 85−90
+7.6%
75−80
−7.6%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+8%
50−55
−8%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+11.9%
40−45
−11.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%
Valorant 110−120
+6.7%
100−110
−6.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+8.8%
65−70
−8.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+10.2%
85−90
−10.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+36.3%
80−85
−36.3%
Valorant 130−140
+7.9%
120−130
−7.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+10.7%
27−30
−10.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+13.3%
14−16
−13.3%
Valorant 65−70
+11.3%
60−65
−11.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Dota 2 45−50
+9.5%
40−45
−9.5%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+10%
20−22
−10%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GTX 760 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 139% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 36% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.71 12.45
Recency 10 November 2020 25 June 2013
Chip lithography 5 nm 28 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
GTX 760 GeForce GTX 760
vs
HD 7950 Radeon HD 7950
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GTX 1050 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
GTX 680 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
HD 7970 AMD Radeon HD 7970
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
GTX 950 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
GTX 660 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
RX 460 AMD Radeon RX 460
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
HD 7870 AMD Radeon HD 7870
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
GTX 1050 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
GTX 750 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU
GTX 560 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
vs
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 8 Core GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 928 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2172 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or GeForce GTX 760, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.