GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with GeForce GTX 550 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.71
+239%

Apple M1 8-Core GPU outperforms GTX 550 Ti by a whopping 239% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking380699
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.79
Power efficiencyno data2.40
Architectureno dataFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameno dataGF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8192
Core clock speed1278 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data116 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rateno data28.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPsno data24
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data4.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data98.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p120−130
+216%
38
−216%
Full HD27
−33.3%
36
+33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.14

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+206%
18−20
−206%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+500%
6−7
−500%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
Valorant 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Dota 2 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Fortnite 75−80
+235%
21−24
−235%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+206%
18−20
−206%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+500%
6−7
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+162%
12−14
−162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Valorant 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%
World of Tanks 180−190
+168%
65−70
−168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+309%
10−12
−309%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+108%
12−14
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Dota 2 45−50
+308%
12−14
−308%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+148%
21−24
−148%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+206%
18−20
−206%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+500%
6−7
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−105
+186%
35−40
−186%
Valorant 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+289%
27−30
−289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
World of Tanks 95−100
+231%
27−30
−231%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Valorant 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Fortnite 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and GTX 550 Ti compete in popular games:

  • Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 216% faster in 900p
  • GTX 550 Ti is 33% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Apple M1 8-Core GPU is 2800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Apple M1 8-Core GPU surpassed GTX 550 Ti in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.71 4.04
Recency 10 November 2020 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 5 nm 40 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has a 239.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The M1 8-Core GPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 550 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 926 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 59551 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.