Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs Apple M1 8-Core GPU

M1 7-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU M1 GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 32-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
VS
Radeon Instinct MI6 Radeon Pro Duo Polaris Radeon Pro V7300X Radeon Pro V7350X2 Radeon Pro WX 5100 Radeon Pro WX 7100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared M1 8-Core GPU with Radeon Pro WX 7100, including specs and performance data.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
2020
13.70

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8-Core GPU
Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking386281
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.60
Power efficiencyno data10.68
Architectureno dataGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameno dataEllesmere
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date10 November 2020 (4 years ago)10 November 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82304
Core clock speed1278 MHz1188 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1243 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rateno data179.0
Floating-point processing powerno data5.728 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
−42.9%
40−45
+42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data19.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−41.1%
75−80
+41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−45.5%
60−65
+45.5%
Fortnite 70−75
−36.5%
100−110
+36.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−55.9%
50−55
+55.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−53.2%
70−75
+53.2%
Valorant 110−120
−27.9%
140−150
+27.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−35
−51.5%
50−55
+51.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−41.1%
75−80
+41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
−27.8%
230−240
+27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Dota 2 85−90
−27.1%
100−110
+27.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−45.5%
60−65
+45.5%
Fortnite 70−75
−36.5%
100−110
+36.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−55.9%
50−55
+55.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−44.9%
70−75
+44.9%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−53.2%
70−75
+53.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−58.8%
50−55
+58.8%
Valorant 110−120
−27.9%
140−150
+27.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−41.1%
75−80
+41.1%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−56.5%
35−40
+56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Dota 2 85−90
−27.1%
100−110
+27.1%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−45.5%
60−65
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−42.6%
75−80
+42.6%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−55.9%
50−55
+55.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−53.2%
70−75
+53.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−58.8%
50−55
+58.8%
Valorant 110−120
−27.9%
140−150
+27.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−36.5%
100−110
+36.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
−41.2%
130−140
+41.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−65%
30−35
+65%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−66.7%
24−27
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
−57.8%
170−180
+57.8%
Valorant 130−140
−30.7%
170−180
+30.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−54.3%
50−55
+54.3%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−53.6%
40−45
+53.6%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−54.8%
45−50
+54.8%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−47.8%
30−35
+47.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
−57.1%
40−45
+57.1%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−41.7%
30−35
+41.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Valorant 65−70
−56.5%
100−110
+56.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−61.1%
27−30
+61.1%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
−80%
9−10
+80%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Dota 2 45−50
−41.3%
65−70
+41.3%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
−70%
16−18
+70%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how Apple M1 8-Core GPU and Pro WX 7100 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 43% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 80% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.70 20.22
Recency 10 November 2020 10 November 2016
Chip lithography 5 nm 14 nm

Apple M1 8-Core GPU has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Pro WX 7100, on the other hand, has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook card while Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
FirePro W9100 FirePro W9100
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTX 480 480
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
Quadro M1200 M1200
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
ATI HD 5770 5770
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GTS 450 450
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
GeForce 320M 320M
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
RX 550 550
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
RX 560 560
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
RX 570 570
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
RX 580 580
Apple M1 8-Core GPU Apple 8 Core GPU
vs
R7 360 360

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 928 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about M1 8-Core GPU or Radeon Pro WX 7100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.