Xeon E7450 vs EPYC 7H12

Place in performance ranking	38	969
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.23	9.42
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	AMD EPYC	no data
Architecture codename	Zen 2 (2019−2020)	no data
Release date	18 September 2019 (4 years ago)	1 July 2008 (15 years ago)
Current price	$1970	$112

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 136% better value for money than Xeon E7450.

Detailed specifications

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)	no data
Threads	128	no data
Base clock speed	2.6 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	no data
L1 cache	96K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	512K (per core)	no data
L3 cache	256 MB (shared)	12 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography	7 nm, 14 nm	45 nm
Die size	192 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	68 °C
Number of transistors	4,800 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.9V-1.45V

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2 (Multiprocessor)	no data
Socket	TR4	PGA604
Power consumption (TDP)	280 Watt	90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-
Idle States	no data	-
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
FSB parity	no data	+
Status	no data	Discontinued

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	no data
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon E7450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Eight-channel	no data
Maximum memory size	4 TiB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	204.763 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.02
+601%

Xeon E7450 6.42

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E7450 by 601% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+601%

Xeon E7450 9932

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon E7450 by 601% in Passmark.