Xeon Platinum 8352Y vs EPYC 7H12

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.03
+1.4%
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
44.39

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking3941
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money5.0214.33
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesAMD EPYCno data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)no data
Release date18 September 2019 (4 years old)1 April 2021 (3 years old)
Current price$6796 $4688

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 185% better value for money than EPYC 7H12.

Technical specs

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads12864
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache4 MBno data
L2 cache32 MBno data
L3 cache256 MB (shared)48 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nm10 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data81 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketTR4FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)280 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channelDDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TiB6 TB
Max memory channels88
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7H12 45.03
+1.4%
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.39

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

EPYC 7H12 69633
+1.4%
Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 45.03 44.39
Recency 18 September 2019 1 April 2021
Physical cores 64 32
Threads 128 64
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 280 Watt 205 Watt

We couldn't decide between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between EPYC 7H12 and Xeon Platinum 8352Y, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7H12 or Xeon Platinum 8352Y, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.