Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads
1.16
+14.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9000
2009
4 cores / 4 threads
1.01

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22412319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Quad
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateAugust 2008 (15 years ago)1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$348
Current price$844 $133 (0.4x MSRP)

Technical specs

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KBno data
L2 cache12 MB6 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Demand Based Switching--
AMT+no data
FSB parity--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.16
+14.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 1.01

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 15% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805
+14.3%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 1579

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 14% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3114
+29.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 2396

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 30% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 10882
+35.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 8008

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 36% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3780
+32%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 2863

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 32% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 15.74
+28.7%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 20.25

Core 2 Quad Q9000 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by 29% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3
+10.5%
Core 2 Quad Q9000 2

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by 11% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.16 1.01

The Core 2 Extreme QX9300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Core 2 Quad Q9000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 65 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 531 vote

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or Core 2 Quad Q9000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.