Core 2 Quad Q9100 vs Core 2 Extreme QX9300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX9300
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.18
Core 2 Quad Q9100
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.25
+5.9%

Core 2 Quad Q9100 outperforms Core 2 Extreme QX9300 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23742325
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 ExtremeCore 2 Quad
Power efficiency2.392.53
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateAugust 2008 (16 years ago)August 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.53 GHz2.26 GHz
Boost clock speed2.53 GHz2.26 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz1066 MHz
L1 cache64 KB64 KB
L2 cache12 MB6 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size2x 107 mm22x 107 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range1.05V-1.175V1.05V-1.175V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketPGA478PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Demand Based Switching--
AMT++
FSB parity--

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1.18
Core 2 Quad Q9100 1.25
+5.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 1805
Core 2 Quad Q9100 1915
+6.1%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3114
+7.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9100 2905

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 10882
+7.9%
Core 2 Quad Q9100 10081

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Extreme QX9300 3780
+14.2%
Core 2 Quad Q9100 3310

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 1.25

Core 2 Quad Q9100 has a 5.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX9300 and Core 2 Quad Q9100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9100
Core 2 Quad Q9100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 91 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 47 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX9300 or Core 2 Quad Q9100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.