Phenom II X4 925 vs Celeron N6211

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.40
Phenom II X4 925
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.40

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24012393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.330.16
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesElkhart Lakeno data
Power efficiency8.330.57
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameElkhart Lake (2022)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release date17 July 2022 (2 years ago)11 May 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54$160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 1981% better value for money than Phenom II X4 925.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.5 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data258 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA1493AM3
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (250 - 750 MHz)On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Celeron N6211 1.40
Phenom II X4 925 1.40

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Celeron N6211 2245
Phenom II X4 925 2254
+0.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 July 2022 11 May 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron N6211 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 925, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Celeron N6211 and AMD Phenom II X4 925.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211
AMD Phenom II X4 925
Phenom II X4 925

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 5 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 346 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 925 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Celeron N6211 and Phenom II X4 925, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.