AMD Turion II M500 vs Intel Celeron M P4500

Price now no data
Games supported 49%
Celeron M P4500
Intel Celeron M P4500
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Turion II M500
AMD Turion II M500
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 100$
Games supported 48%

General info

Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking24622519
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD Turion II
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 April 2010 (13 years old)10 September 2009 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current priceno data$100

Technical specs

Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support2500 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-no data


Information on Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPGA988Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNowno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M P4500 0.77
Turion II M500 0.67

Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 15% in our combined benchmark results.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron M P4500 2533
Turion II M500 1865

Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 36% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M P4500 4826
Turion II M500 3591

Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 34% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Celeron M P4500 37.1
Turion II M500 34.76

Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 7% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Celeron M P4500 1
Turion II M500 1

Turion II M500 outperforms Celeron M P4500 by 4% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score 0.77 0.67
Recency 1 April 2010 10 September 2009
Boost clock speed 1860 2200
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

Based on the results of synthetic tests, our recommendation leans towards the Celeron M P4500 due to its superior performance when compared to the Turion II M500 processor.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron M P4500
Celeron M P4500
AMD Turion II M500
Turion II M500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 11 votes

Rate Intel Celeron M P4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 20 votes

Rate AMD Turion II M500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M P4500 or Turion II M500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.