AMD Turion II M500 vs Intel Celeron M P4500
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparing Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2462 | 2519 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD Turion II |
Architecture codename | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Caspian (2009) |
Release date | 1 April 2010 (13 years old) | 10 September 2009 (13 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
Current price | no data | $100 |
Technical specs
Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Bus support | 2500 MHz | 3600 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 81+114 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 382+177 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PGA988 | Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin |
Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization |
PowerNow | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 15% in our combined benchmark results.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 36% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 34% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms Turion II M500 by 7% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Turion II M500 outperforms Celeron M P4500 by 4% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 0.77 | 0.67 |
Recency | 1 April 2010 | 10 September 2009 |
Boost clock speed | 1860 | 2200 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
Based on the results of synthetic tests, our recommendation leans towards the Celeron M P4500 due to its superior performance when compared to the Turion II M500 processor.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M P4500 and Turion II M500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.