Celeron M P4500 vs A6-4400M
Aggregated performance score
A6-4400M outperforms Celeron M P4500 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2626 | 2643 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD A-Series | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 15 May 2012 (11 years ago) | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
| Current price | $95 | no data |
Detailed specifications
A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 2500 MHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FS1r2 | PGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | unknown | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 7520G | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
A6-4400M outperforms Celeron M P4500 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms A6-4400M by 11% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms A6-4400M by 42% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Benchmark coverage: 18%
A6-4400M outperforms Celeron M P4500 by 26% in wPrime 32.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Celeron M P4500 outperforms A6-4400M by 3% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.65 | 0.63 |
| Recency | 15 May 2012 | 1 April 2010 |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500.
Should you still have questions on choice between A6-4400M and Celeron M P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
