Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ vs Celeron M 450

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	not rated	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Mobile Athlon 64
Architecture codename	Yonah (2005−2006)	Oakville (2003−2004)
Release date	no data (2024 years ago)	August 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	2 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	2 GHz
Bus rate	533 MHz	800 MHz
L1 cache	no data	128K
L2 cache	no data	512K
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	no data
Chip lithography	65 nm	no data
Die size	no data	193 mm2
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	106 million
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.0V-1.3V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	no data	1
Socket	PPGA478	754
Power consumption (TDP)	27 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	no data
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Power consumption (TDP)

27 Watt

35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 450 and Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---