Mobile Athlon 64 3000+: specs and benchmarks

VS

Summary

AMD started Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ sales on August 2003. This is an Oakville architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at home systems.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket 754 processor with a TDP of 35 Watt. It supports DDR1 memory.

Primary details

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the rankingnot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency0.20of 100.00 (Apple M4 (8 cores))
DesignerAMD
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)
Release dateAugust 2003 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)
Threads1
Boost clock speed2 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Bus rate800 MHz
L1 cache128Kof 96 KB (Xeon 6990E+)
L2 cache512Kof 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
Die size193 mm2
Number of transistors106 millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Opteron 842)
Socket754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattof 600 Watt (EPYC 9996)

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+'s memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 293
Samples: 1

Intel equivalent

It seems that there's no Intel equivalent for Mobile Athlon 64 3000+. The nearest candidate is Pentium M 735, however, it's 0% faster and higher by 0 positions in our rating.

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 13 configurations using Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in our database.

GT 1030 GeForce GT 1030
7.7% (1/13)
GT 430 GeForce GT 430
7.7% (1/13)
9600M GS GeForce 9600M GS
7.7% (1/13)
7100 GS GeForce 7100 GS
7.7% (1/13)
ATI X550 Radeon X550
15.4% (2/13)
ATI 9600 PRO Radeon 9600 PRO
7.7% (1/13)
ATI 9600 Radeon 9600
7.7% (1/13)
ATI 9550 Radeon 9550
7.7% (1/13)
GeForce 6100 GeForce 6100
7.7% (1/13)

All comparisons with Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processor Mobile Athlon 64 3000+, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.