Mobile Sempron 3400+ vs Celeron M 550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 550
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.29
+70.6%
Mobile Sempron 3400+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.17

Celeron M 550 outperforms Mobile Sempron 3400+ by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 550 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31233280
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron MMobile Sempron
Power efficiency0.910.26
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Albany
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 550 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed2 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz800 MHz
Chip lithography65 nmno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 550 and Mobile Sempron 3400+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt62 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 550 0.29
+70.6%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 0.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 550 465
+72.9%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 269

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 550 877
+32.1%
Mobile Sempron 3400+ 664

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 0.17
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 62 Watt

Celeron M 550 has a 70.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 106.7% lower power consumption.

The Celeron M 550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3400+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 550 and Mobile Sempron 3400+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550
AMD Mobile Sempron 3400+
Mobile Sempron 3400+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 3 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 550 or Mobile Sempron 3400+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.