Athlon Neo X2 L325 vs Celeron M 550

VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron M 550
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.29
Athlon Neo X2 L325
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.35
+20.7%

Athlon Neo X2 L325 outperforms Celeron M 550 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 550 and Athlon Neo X2 L325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31233062
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCeleron M2x AMD Athlon Neo
Power efficiency0.911.84
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Congo (2009)
Release dateno data10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 550 and Athlon Neo X2 L325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz1600 MHz
L2 cacheno data1 MB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 550 and Athlon Neo X2 L325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataASB1
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 550 and Athlon Neo X2 L325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technology
VirusProtect-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 550 and Athlon Neo X2 L325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 550 0.29
Athlon Neo X2 L325 0.35
+20.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron M 550 465
Athlon Neo X2 L325 556
+19.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.29 0.35
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 18 Watt

Athlon Neo X2 L325 has a 20.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 550 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 550 and Athlon Neo X2 L325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 550
Celeron M 550
AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Athlon Neo X2 L325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Celeron M 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 8 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 550 or Athlon Neo X2 L325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.