A4-3300 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
A4-3300 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3004 | 2814 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.08 | 0.86 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) | 7 September 2011 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 228 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon HD 6410D |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.40 | 0.59 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 7 September 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 has 85.7% lower power consumption.
A4-3300, on the other hand, has a 47.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
The A4-3300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while A4-3300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and A4-3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
