A4-3300 vs Core 2 Duo T5750

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiencyno data0.86
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 May 2008 (16 years ago)7 September 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6410D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5750 702
A4-3300 942
+34.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T5750 199
A4-3300 235
+18.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T5750 331
A4-3300 423
+27.8%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2008 7 September 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Duo T5750 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

A4-3300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T5750 is a notebook processor while A4-3300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5750 and A4-3300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5750
Core 2 Duo T5750
AMD A4-3300
A4-3300

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 88 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 116 votes

Rate A4-3300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5750 or A4-3300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.