E2-3200 vs Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Aggregate performance score
E2-3200 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1500 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3290 | 3079 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Celeron Dual-Core | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.93 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 May 2008 (17 years ago) | 7 September 2011 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and E2-3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.87 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 228 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and E2-3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FM1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 KB | 65 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and E2-3200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core T1500 and E2-3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon HD 6370D |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.36 | 0.56 |
| Recency | 1 May 2008 | 7 September 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 512 Watt | 65 Watt |
E2-3200 has a 55.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 687.7% lower power consumption.
The AMD E2-3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron Dual-Core T1500 is a notebook processor while E2-3200 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
