AMD Athlon II Neo K325 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

Comparing Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreAMD Athlon II Neo
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Geneva (2010)
Release date1 September 2009 (14 years old)12 May 2010 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data
Current priceno data$26

Technical specs

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus support800 MHz2000 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956S1
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3 memory controller, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
PowerNowno data+
VirusProtectno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 482
+15.6%
Athlon II Neo K325 417

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by 16% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1250
+12.5%
Athlon II Neo K325 1111

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by 13% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 2380
+7.4%
Athlon II Neo K325 2215

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by 7% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 1000
Athlon II Neo K325 1036
+3.6%

Athlon II Neo K325 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 by 4% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 1 September 2009 12 May 2010
Boost clock speed 1200 1300
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 and Athlon II Neo K325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
AMD Athlon II Neo K325
Athlon II Neo K325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate Intel Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate AMD Athlon II Neo K325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron Dual-Core SU2300 or Athlon II Neo K325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.