Radeon 820M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) with Radeon 820M, including specs and performance data.
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) outperforms 820M by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 791 | 1053 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) | RDNA 3+ (2024) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake Xe | Krackan Point |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (4 years ago) | 2 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1450 MHz | 2900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory clock speed | no data | 7500 MHz |
| Shared memory | + | + |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_1 | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 19
+138%
| 8−9
−138%
|
| 1440p | 16
+167%
| 6−7
−167%
|
| 4K | 9
+200%
| 3−4
−200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| God of War | 13
+117%
|
6−7
−117%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Fortnite | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| God of War | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
| Valorant | 64
+93.9%
|
30−35
−93.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 10−11
+150%
|
4−5
−150%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 55−60
+90%
|
30−33
−90%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 35
+150%
|
14−16
−150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Fortnite | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+600%
|
1−2
−600%
|
| God of War | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Valorant | 51
+54.5%
|
30−35
−54.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+450%
|
2−3
−450%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 32
+167%
|
12−14
−167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+200%
|
3−4
−200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| God of War | 8−9
+33.3%
|
6−7
−33.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
+55.6%
|
9−10
−55.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
+161%
|
18−20
−161%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 16−18
+300%
|
4−5
−300%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
+188%
|
8−9
−188%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+170%
|
10−11
−170%
|
| Valorant | 36
+620%
|
5−6
−620%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
+133%
|
3−4
−133%
|
| God of War | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 6−7
+200%
|
2−3
−200%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Valorant | 14−16
+114%
|
7−8
−114%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 12
+140%
|
5−6
−140%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| God of War | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 138% faster in 1080p
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 167% faster in 1440p
- UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 200% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is 800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) surpassed Radeon 820M in all 43 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.02 | 1.29 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 2 June 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) has a 134.1% higher aggregate performance score.
Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 820M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
