RTX A4500 Mobile vs UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
2.11

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 1813% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.40
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)22 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165888
Core clock speed350 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data140 Watt
Texture fill rateno data276.0
Floating-point processing powerno data17.66 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−1809%
210−220
+1809%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 23
−900%
230−240
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10
−1260%
130−140
+1260%
Counter-Strike 2 17
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%
Far Cry 5 8
−1513%
120−130
+1513%
Fortnite 10−11
−1660%
170−180
+1660%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1336%
150−160
+1336%
Forza Horizon 5 9
−1311%
120−130
+1311%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1225%
150−160
+1225%
Valorant 40−45
−488%
230−240
+488%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−2167%
130−140
+2167%
Counter-Strike 2 5
−4500%
230−240
+4500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−547%
270−280
+547%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%
Dota 2 23
−535%
140−150
+535%
Far Cry 5 7
−1743%
120−130
+1743%
Fortnite 10−11
−1660%
170−180
+1660%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1336%
150−160
+1336%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−6250%
120−130
+6250%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
−2117%
130−140
+2117%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−2375%
95−100
+2375%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1225%
150−160
+1225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9
−1556%
140−150
+1556%
Valorant 40−45
−488%
230−240
+488%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−2167%
130−140
+2167%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−1820%
95−100
+1820%
Dota 2 22
−564%
140−150
+564%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−1336%
150−160
+1336%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1517%
95−100
+1517%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1225%
150−160
+1225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−2880%
140−150
+2880%
Valorant 40−45
−488%
230−240
+488%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
−1660%
170−180
+1660%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−5300%
100−110
+5300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1793%
280−290
+1793%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Metro Exodus 0−1 60−65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−733%
170−180
+733%
Valorant 18−20
−1372%
260−270
+1372%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1583%
100−110
+1583%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2280%
110−120
+2280%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−2350%
45−50
+2350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2600%
80−85
+2600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−2625%
100−110
+2625%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−507%
90−95
+507%
Valorant 10−12
−2155%
240−250
+2155%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Dota 2 5−6
−2200%
110−120
+2200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1300%
55−60
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7800%
75−80
+7800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−1833%
55−60
+1833%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 1809% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A4500 Mobile is 8300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is ahead in 56 tests (88%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 40.36
Recency 30 March 2021 22 March 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm

RTX A4500 Mobile has a 1812.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 368 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 29 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or RTX A4500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.