3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP vs Radeon Vega 7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking600not rated
Place by popularity17not in top-100
Power efficiency11.32no data
ArchitectureGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)Voodoo Scalable (2000)
GPU code nameCezanneVSA-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 April 2021 (4 years ago)13 October 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448no data
Core clock speed300 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1900 MHzno data
Number of transistors9,800 million14 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate53.200.33
Floating-point processing power1.702 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs282

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 April 2021 13 October 2000
Chip lithography 7 nm 250 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 7 has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP, on the other hand, has 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Vega 7 and 3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook graphics card while 3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP
Voodoo4 4500 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3076 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate 3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Vega 7 or 3dfx Voodoo4 4500 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.