Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 630
Aggregated performance score
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 748% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 720 | 191 |
| Place by popularity | 30 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 0.37 | 6.19 |
| Architecture | Gen. 9.5 (2017) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Kaby-Lake-H-GT2 | N19E-Q1 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2017 (6 years ago) | 27 May 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Current price | $457 | $2393 |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RTX 3000 Mobile has 1573% better value for money than UHD Graphics 630.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 24 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1150 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 189 million | 10,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.45 | 198.7 |
| Floating-point performance | 460.8 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on UHD Graphics 630 and Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 448.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.103 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 748% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 749% in Passmark.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 553% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1011% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1126% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 833% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 386% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 284% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 3339% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 622% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 751% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1384% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 900% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
Benchmark coverage: 3%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 3833% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.
SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 900% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.
SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 386% in SPECviewperf 12 - Maya.
SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 622% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.
SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 284% in SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks.
SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 3339% in SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX.
SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 751% in SPECviewperf 12 - Creo.
SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1384% in SPECviewperf 12 - Medical.
SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 3833% in SPECviewperf 12 - Energy.
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
Benchmark coverage: 2%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1154% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05.
SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max
This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.
Benchmark coverage: 1%
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by 1154% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 17
−459%
| 95
+459%
|
| 1440p | 10
−700%
| 80−85
+700%
|
| 4K | 7
−1157%
| 88
+1157%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5
−760%
|
40−45
+760%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7
−1000%
|
77
+1000%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−1100%
|
80−85
+1100%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−431%
|
65−70
+431%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−617%
|
40−45
+617%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6
−1033%
|
65−70
+1033%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 8
−1038%
|
91
+1038%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−988%
|
85−90
+988%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8
−888%
|
75−80
+888%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−1020%
|
55−60
+1020%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7
−500%
|
40−45
+500%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6
−1567%
|
100
+1567%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−1450%
|
62
+1450%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−1100%
|
80−85
+1100%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−431%
|
65−70
+431%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−617%
|
40−45
+617%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1260%
|
65−70
+1260%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−1620%
|
86
+1620%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−988%
|
85−90
+988%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
−1217%
|
75−80
+1217%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−1020%
|
55−60
+1020%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3
−1367%
|
40−45
+1367%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−600%
|
40−45
+600%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−740%
|
84
+740%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1457%
|
109
+1457%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−875%
|
39
+875%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8
−1100%
|
80−85
+1100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−617%
|
40−45
+617%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−1260%
|
65−70
+1260%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−1440%
|
77
+1440%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−988%
|
85−90
+988%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−700%
|
56
+700%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2400%
|
50−55
+2400%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−700%
|
40−45
+700%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
−633%
|
40−45
+633%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11
−250%
|
35−40
+250%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2500%
|
24−27
+2500%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−750%
|
16−18
+750%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−800%
|
45−50
+800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2600%
|
50−55
+2600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−967%
|
30−35
+967%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−950%
|
21−24
+950%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−143%
|
16−18
+143%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−1600%
|
16−18
+1600%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−450%
|
21−24
+450%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−333%
|
24−27
+333%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 630 and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 3000 Mobile is 459% faster than UHD Graphics 630 in 1080p
- RTX 3000 Mobile is 700% faster than UHD Graphics 630 in 1440p
- RTX 3000 Mobile is 1157% faster than UHD Graphics 630 in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 2700% faster than the UHD Graphics 630.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics 630 in all 54 of our tests.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 3.08 | 26.12 |
| Recency | 1 October 2017 | 27 May 2019 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.
Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
