UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3000 Mobile
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
26.31
+326%

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 770 by a whopping 326% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking213583
Place by popularitynot in top-10031
Power efficiency22.6928.38
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameTU106Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304256
Core clock speed945 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate198.726.40
Floating-point processing power6.359 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs14416
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.31
+326%
UHD Graphics 770 6.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+896%
UHD Graphics 770 1016

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+20.9%
UHD Graphics 770 16443

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+1795%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+333%
UHD Graphics 770 3428

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3000 Mobile 91394
UHD Graphics 770 119185
+30.4%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3000 Mobile 5589
+111%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+442%
19
−442%
4K88
+529%
14
−529%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+250%
14−16
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+350%
12
−350%
Elden Ring 85−90
+444%
16−18
−444%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+321%
18−20
−321%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+250%
14−16
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+980%
5
−980%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+404%
23
−404%
Metro Exodus 91
+507%
14−16
−507%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
Valorant 100−110
+556%
16
−556%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+321%
18−20
−321%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+717%
6
−717%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%
Dota 2 44
+120%
20
−120%
Elden Ring 85−90
+691%
11
−691%
Far Cry 5 86
+187%
30
−187%
Fortnite 130−140
+261%
35−40
−261%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+544%
18
−544%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+889%
9
−889%
Metro Exodus 43
+187%
14−16
−187%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110
+116%
50−55
−116%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+217%
18−20
−217%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+353%
18−20
−353%
Valorant 100−110
+483%
18−20
−483%
World of Tanks 260−270
+168%
95−100
−168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+321%
18−20
−321%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+250%
14−16
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+350%
12−14
−350%
Dota 2 121
+203%
40
−203%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+182%
27−30
−182%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+625%
16
−625%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+218%
50−55
−218%
Valorant 100−110
+483%
18−20
−483%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
Elden Ring 45−50
+571%
7−8
−571%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+650%
6−7
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+373%
35−40
−373%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
World of Tanks 170−180
+284%
45−50
−284%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+156%
9−10
−156%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+500%
12−14
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+600%
10−11
−600%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+650%
8−9
−650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Valorant 70−75
+350%
16−18
−350%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Dota 2 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%
Elden Ring 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+900%
2−3
−900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+350%
18−20
−350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+171%
16−18
−171%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Dota 2 88
+529%
14
−529%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%
Fortnite 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+583%
6−7
−583%
Valorant 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%

This is how RTX 3000 Mobile and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 442% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 529% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 980% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3000 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics 770 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.31 6.17
Recency 27 May 2019 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 12 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 3000 Mobile has a 326.4% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 770 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 317 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1283 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.