ATI Radeon HD 4350 vs Titan X Pascal

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal and Radeon HD 4350, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
31.38
+8158%

Titan X Pascal outperforms ATI HD 4350 by a whopping 8158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1721275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.46no data
Power efficiency9.181.39
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGP102RV710
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)30 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358480
Core clock speed1417 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million242 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate342.94.800
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs2248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XDDR3
Maximum RAM amount12 GB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 31.38
+8158%
ATI HD 4350 0.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+8197%
ATI HD 4350 157

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Titan X Pascal 100948
+14573%
ATI HD 4350 688

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD124
+1671%
7
−1671%
1440p740−1
4K580−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.67no data
1440p16.20no data
4K20.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 337
+8325%
4−5
−8325%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+8200%
1−2
−8200%
Hogwarts Legacy 119
+3867%
3−4
−3867%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 153
+15200%
1−2
−15200%
Counter-Strike 2 291
+9600%
3−4
−9600%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+7300%
1−2
−7300%
Far Cry 5 162
+16100%
1−2
−16100%
Fortnite 210
+10400%
2−3
−10400%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+4133%
3−4
−4133%
Forza Horizon 5 119
+11800%
1−2
−11800%
Hogwarts Legacy 90
+2900%
3−4
−2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+1514%
7−8
−1514%
Valorant 296
+996%
27−30
−996%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 147
+14600%
1−2
−14600%
Counter-Strike 2 205
+10150%
2−3
−10150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1740%
14−16
−1740%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+6400%
1−2
−6400%
Dota 2 252
+2420%
10−11
−2420%
Far Cry 5 149
+14800%
1−2
−14800%
Fortnite 199
+9850%
2−3
−9850%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+3933%
3−4
−3933%
Forza Horizon 5 106
+10500%
1−2
−10500%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+15900%
1−2
−15900%
Hogwarts Legacy 72
+2300%
3−4
−2300%
Metro Exodus 96 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+1514%
7−8
−1514%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+3580%
5−6
−3580%
Valorant 275
+919%
27−30
−919%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 137
+13600%
1−2
−13600%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+5600%
1−2
−5600%
Dota 2 232
+2220%
10−11
−2220%
Far Cry 5 140
+13900%
1−2
−13900%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+3633%
3−4
−3633%
Hogwarts Legacy 55
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+1357%
7−8
−1357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+1800%
5−6
−1800%
Valorant 181
+570%
27−30
−570%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170
+8400%
2−3
−8400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 111
+11000%
1−2
−11000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+10200%
1−2
−10200%
Metro Exodus 58 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+4275%
4−5
−4275%
Valorant 258
+8500%
3−4
−8500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+8300%
1−2
−8300%
Cyberpunk 2077 37 0−1
Far Cry 5 101
+3267%
3−4
−3267%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+8500%
1−2
−8500%
Hogwarts Legacy 41 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+560%
14−16
−560%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22 0−1
Metro Exodus 36 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68 0−1
Valorant 257
+12750%
2−3
−12750%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 17 0−1
Dota 2 160
+15900%
1−2
−15900%
Far Cry 5 53
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Forza Horizon 4 73 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

This is how Titan X Pascal and ATI HD 4350 compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 1671% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 12750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Titan X Pascal surpassed ATI HD 4350 in all 31 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.38 0.38
Recency 2 August 2016 30 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 20 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 8157.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4350, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4350 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
ATI Radeon HD 4350
Radeon HD 4350

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 222 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or Radeon HD 4350, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.