Radeon E2400 vs Titan X Pascal

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	144	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.85	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	GP102	RV610
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 July 2016 (7 years ago)	28 June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$312 (0.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	40
Core clock speed	1418 MHz	600 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	11,800 million	180 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	342.9	2.400
Floating-point performance	10,974 gflops	48 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-II
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	25 July 2016	28 June 2007
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	25 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---