GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs Titan X Pascal

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Titan X Pascal with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Titan X Pascal
2016
12 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
33.10
+28.6%

Titan X Pascal outperforms RTX 3050 Ti Mobile by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking161217
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.80no data
Power efficiency9.3024.09
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP102GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1417 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1531 MHz1035 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate342.982.80
Floating-point processing power10.97 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs9648
TMUs22480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth480.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Titan X Pascal 33.10
+28.6%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 25.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Titan X Pascal 13026
+28.7%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10125

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Titan X Pascal 35981
+99.3%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 18057

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Titan X Pascal 27349
+105%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 13360

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 136891
+87.7%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 72925

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Titan X Pascal 514513
+21.7%
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 422757

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+68.4%
76
−68.4%
1440p76
+76.7%
43
−76.7%
4K59
+111%
28
−111%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.37no data
1440p15.78no data
4K20.32no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 173
+84%
94
−84%
Counter-Strike 2 92
+87.8%
45−50
−87.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+33.9%
62
−33.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 127
+78.9%
71
−78.9%
Battlefield 5 153
+41.7%
108
−41.7%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+51%
45−50
−51%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+25.4%
59
−25.4%
Far Cry 5 162
+105%
79
−105%
Fortnite 210
+73.6%
120−130
−73.6%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+29.6%
95−100
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+42.5%
87
−42.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+17.7%
95−100
−17.7%
Valorant 296
+76.2%
160−170
−76.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 78
+85.7%
42
−85.7%
Battlefield 5 147
+50%
98
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+28.6%
45−50
−28.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+6.6%
250−260
−6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+44.4%
45
−44.4%
Dota 2 252
+114%
118
−114%
Far Cry 5 149
+101%
74
−101%
Fortnite 199
+64.5%
120−130
−64.5%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+23.5%
95−100
−23.5%
Forza Horizon 5 113
+94.8%
58
−94.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+70.2%
94
−70.2%
Metro Exodus 96
+68.4%
57
−68.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 113
+17.7%
95−100
−17.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+100%
92
−100%
Valorant 275
+63.7%
160−170
−63.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 137
+53.9%
89
−53.9%
Counter-Strike 2 55
+12.2%
45−50
−12.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+42.5%
40
−42.5%
Dota 2 232
+105%
113
−105%
Far Cry 5 140
+106%
68
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+14.3%
95−100
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 97
+70.2%
57
−70.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
+6.3%
95−100
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+90%
50
−90%
Valorant 181
+61.6%
112
−61.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170
+40.5%
120−130
−40.5%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+25.4%
170−180
−25.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+151%
41
−151%
Metro Exodus 58
+70.6%
34
−70.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 258
+24.6%
200−210
−24.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+21.7%
69
−21.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+68.2%
22
−68.2%
Far Cry 5 101
+102%
50
−102%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+34.4%
60−65
−34.4%
Forza Horizon 5 72
+63.6%
40−45
−63.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+36.6%
40−45
−36.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+35.6%
55−60
−35.6%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+25%
20−22
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 99
+125%
44
−125%
Metro Exodus 36
+71.4%
21
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+134%
29
−134%
Valorant 257
+77.2%
140−150
−77.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 71
+86.8%
38
−86.8%
Counter-Strike 2 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+70%
10
−70%
Dota 2 160
+196%
54
−196%
Far Cry 5 53
+152%
21
−152%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+69.8%
40−45
−69.8%
Forza Horizon 5 45
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60
+122%
27−30
−122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is 68% faster in 1080p
  • Titan X Pascal is 77% faster in 1440p
  • Titan X Pascal is 111% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 196% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 50% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Titan X Pascal is ahead in 64 tests (96%)
  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.10 25.73
Recency 2 August 2016 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Titan X Pascal has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Titan X Pascal is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Titan X Pascal is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 3001 vote

Rate Titan X Pascal on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4354 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Titan X Pascal or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.