GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.34
+38.6%

TITAN V outperforms RTX 2070 Mobile by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking70161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.2411.34
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGV100N18E-G2 TU106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data
Current price$228 (0.1x MSRP)$1758

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

TITAN V has 255% better value for money than RTX 2070 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202304
Core clock speed1200 MHz1215 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6213.8
Floating-point performance14,899 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on TITAN V and GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1696 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN V 44.34
+38.6%
RTX 2070 Mobile 31.99

TITAN V outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile by 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

TITAN V 17125
+38.6%
RTX 2070 Mobile 12354

TITAN V outperforms GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile by 39% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+31.1%
122
−31.1%
1440p152
+108%
73
−108%
4K82
+70.8%
48
−70.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
Battlefield 5 142
+42%
100−105
−42%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+41.3%
75−80
−41.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Far Cry 5 125
+38.9%
90−95
−38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 127
+41.1%
90−95
−41.1%
Forza Horizon 4 113
+41.3%
80−85
−41.3%
Hitman 3 100
+42.9%
70−75
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
+50.9%
110−120
−50.9%
Metro Exodus 143
+43%
100−105
−43%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+41.3%
75−80
−41.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 183
+40.8%
130−140
−40.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
+43.1%
65−70
−43.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 84
+40%
60−65
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Battlefield 5 127
+41.1%
90−95
−41.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 94
+44.6%
65−70
−44.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Far Cry 5 97
+49.2%
65−70
−49.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+43.1%
65−70
−43.1%
Forza Horizon 4 287
+43.5%
200−210
−43.5%
Hitman 3 81
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230
+43.8%
160−170
−43.8%
Metro Exodus 110
+46.7%
75−80
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 149
+49%
100−105
−49%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+42%
100−105
−42%
Watch Dogs: Legion 211
+40.7%
150−160
−40.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Far Cry 5 73
+46%
50−55
−46%
Forza Horizon 4 94
+44.6%
65−70
−44.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
+42.5%
80−85
−42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125
+38.9%
90−95
−38.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+48%
50−55
−48%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
+40%
40−45
−40%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+41.5%
65−70
−41.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 88
+46.7%
60−65
−46.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Far Cry 5 76
+52%
50−55
−52%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Hitman 3 56
+40%
40−45
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+45%
60−65
−45%
Metro Exodus 74
+48%
50−55
−48%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+48%
50−55
−48%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
+40%
30−33
−40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73
+46%
50−55
−46%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Hitman 3 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%

This is how TITAN V and RTX 2070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 31% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 108% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 71% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.34 31.99
Recency 7 December 2017 6 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 115 Watt

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3274 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 439 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.