GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN V with GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

TITAN V
2017
12 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
44.45
+12.8%

TITAN V outperforms RTX 2080 Mobile by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking83114
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.2118.05
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100TU104B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)29 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202944
Core clock speed1200 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1590 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6292.6
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS9.362 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs320184
Tensor Cores640368
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width3072 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA7.07.5
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD160−170
+10.3%
145
−10.3%
1440p152
+55.1%
98
−55.1%
4K82
+22.4%
67
−22.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p18.74no data
1440p19.73no data
4K36.57no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 206
+0%
206
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 147
+0%
147
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 243
+0%
243
+0%
Valorant 276
+0%
276
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Battlefield 5 118
+0%
118
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Fortnite 169
+0%
169
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 145
+0%
145
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
+0%
101
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
+0%
214
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+0%
174
+0%
Valorant 266
+0%
266
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 139
+0%
139
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 174
+0%
174
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+0%
95
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 155
+0%
155
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260
+0%
260
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 124
+0%
124
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 240
+0%
240
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
+0%
61
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 61
+0%
61
+0%

This is how TITAN V and RTX 2080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • TITAN V is 10% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN V is 55% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN V is 22% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 44.45 39.42
Recency 7 December 2017 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 150 Watt

TITAN V has a 12.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2080 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The TITAN V is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3310 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 147 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.