Quadro M4000 vs T1200 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared T1200 Mobile with Quadro M4000, including specs and performance data.

T1200 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 95 Watt
19.98
+16.6%

T1200 Mobile outperforms M4000 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking280321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.99
Power efficiency14.679.95
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameno dataGM204
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)29 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$791

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241664
Core clock speed855 MHz773 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data80.39
Floating-point processing powerno data2.573 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data104

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno dataUp to 192 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Multi-display synchronizationno dataQuadro Sync

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
High-Performance Video I/O6no data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

T1200 Mobile 19.98
+16.6%
Quadro M4000 17.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

T1200 Mobile 7777
+16.6%
Quadro M4000 6669

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+18%
50−55
−18%
1440p33
+22.2%
27−30
−22.2%
4K109
+21.1%
90−95
−21.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data15.82
1440pno data29.30
4Kno data8.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 89
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+25%
40−45
−25%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Valorant 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Dota 2 86
+22.9%
70−75
−22.9%
Far Cry 5 67
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Fortnite 100−110
+18.9%
90−95
−18.9%
Forza Horizon 4 73
+21.7%
60−65
−21.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Valorant 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
World of Tanks 230−240
+22.6%
190−200
−22.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+28%
50−55
−28%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Dota 2 107
+18.9%
90−95
−18.9%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+26%
50−55
−26%
Forza Horizon 5 40
+33.3%
30−33
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+22.7%
110−120
−22.7%
Valorant 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+22.9%
140−150
−22.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
World of Tanks 130−140
+24.5%
110−120
−24.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Valorant 50−55
+30%
40−45
−30%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Dota 2 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+25.9%
27−30
−25.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 109
+21.1%
90−95
−21.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Fortnite 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Valorant 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%

This is how T1200 Mobile and Quadro M4000 compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 18% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 22% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 21% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.98 17.13
Recency 12 April 2021 29 June 2015
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 120 Watt

T1200 Mobile has a 16.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 26.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro M4000, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Quadro M4000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 245 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.