Quadro T1200 Mobile vs M4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M4000 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M4000
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
17.29

T1200 Mobile outperforms Quadro M4000 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking297259
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.22no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGM204TU117
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 no data
Current price$314 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16641024
Core clock speed773 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate80.3991.20
Floating-point performance2,573 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000 and Quadro T1200 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model56.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA5.27.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−16%
58
+16%
1440p27−30
−22.2%
33
+22.2%
4K70−75
−15.7%
81
+15.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−30%
35−40
+30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
−17.5%
47
+17.5%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−20%
65−70
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−18.2%
65
+18.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−17.8%
50−55
+17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−21.3%
90−95
+21.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
−30%
35−40
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−20%
60
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−18%
59
+18%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−20%
54
+20%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−30%
35−40
+30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−16.7%
28
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−20%
65−70
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−18%
59
+18%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−17.8%
50−55
+17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−21.3%
90−95
+21.3%
Hitman 3 30−33
−30%
35−40
+30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−17.5%
47
+17.5%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−20%
65−70
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−25.7%
44
+25.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
−18.3%
71
+18.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−17.5%
47
+17.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−30%
35−40
+30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−16.7%
21
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−20%
65−70
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
−18.5%
30−35
+18.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−24.4%
56
+24.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−17.8%
50−55
+17.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−21.3%
90−95
+21.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−23.3%
37
+23.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−18.8%
19
+18.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−23.8%
24−27
+23.8%
Hitman 3 18−20
−27.8%
21−24
+27.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−18.5%
32
+18.5%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−23.3%
35−40
+23.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−22.2%
30−35
+22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−17.1%
40−45
+17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−27.8%
21−24
+27.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−26.7%
35−40
+26.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−17.1%
41
+17.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−30%
35−40
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−20%
12
+20%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Hitman 3 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−30%
12−14
+30%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−25%
20−22
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−22.2%
10−12
+22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−25%
14−16
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

This is how Quadro M4000 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T1200 Mobile is 16% faster in 1080p
  • T1200 Mobile is 22% faster in 1440p
  • T1200 Mobile is 16% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.29 19.95
Recency 29 June 2015 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 95 Watt

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
Quadro T1200 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 219 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 131 vote

Rate Quadro T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.