Arc A750 vs Radeon VII

Place in the ranking	86	179
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.12	57.44
Power efficiency	10.06	9.76
Architecture	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	Vega 20	DG2-512
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	7 February 2019 (5 years ago)	12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A750 has 129% better value for money than Radeon VII.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3840	3584
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	2050 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	13,230 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	420.0	537.6
Floating-point processing power	13.44 TFLOPS	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	112
TMUs	240	224
Tensor Cores	no data	448
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	280 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	1024 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon VII 43.05
+35.2%

Arc A750 31.84

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Radeon VII 16549
+35.2%

Arc A750 12237

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Radeon VII 37881
+1.6%

Arc A750 37288

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Radeon VII 62128

Arc A750 98837
+59.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Radeon VII 27449

Arc A750 29667
+8.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 146094
+11.8%

Arc A750 130715

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Radeon VII 430170

Arc A750 634482
+47.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	123 +12.8%	109 −12.8%
1440p	79 +33.9%	59 −33.9%
4K	58 +61.1%	36 −61.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.68 −114%	2.65 +114%
1440p	8.85 −80.6%	4.90 +80.6%
4K	12.05 −50.1%	8.03 +50.1%

Arc A750 has 114% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc A750 has 81% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Arc A750 has 50% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +1.1%	91 −1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 +43.1%	65−70 −43.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	92 +0%	90−95 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +4.5%	88 −4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +48.1%	27−30 −48.1%
Forza Horizon 4	118 −142%	285 +142%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +31.3%	80−85 −31.3%
Metro Exodus	95 −22.1%	116 +22.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	126 +90.9%	65−70 −90.9%
Valorant	238 +88.9%	120−130 −88.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	153 +66.3%	90−95 −66.3%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +21.1%	76 −21.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
Dota 2	128 +29.3%	99 −29.3%
Far Cry 5	103 +51.5%	68 −51.5%
Fortnite	180−190 +22.8%	140−150 −22.8%
Forza Horizon 4	97 −146%	239 +146%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +31.3%	80−85 −31.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	111 +12.1%	99 −12.1%
Metro Exodus	80 −17.5%	94 +17.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +13.7%	180−190 −13.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	70 +6.1%	65−70 −6.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +44.4%	100−110 −44.4%
Valorant	143 +13.5%	120−130 −13.5%
World of Tanks	270−280 +1.1%	270−280 −1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	82 −12.2%	90−95 +12.2%
Counter-Strike 2	90−95 +22.7%	75 −22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +55.6%	18−20 −55.6%
Dota 2	147 +47%	100−105 −47%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +14.8%	85−90 −14.8%
Forza Horizon 4	84 −137%	199 +137%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 +31.3%	80−85 −31.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150 −21.3%	180−190 +21.3%
Valorant	197 +56.3%	120−130 −56.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	43 +4.9%	41 −4.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	43 +4.9%	41 −4.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	46 +53.3%	30−33 −53.3%
World of Tanks	270−280 +32.7%	200−210 −32.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +24.2%	60−65 −24.2%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 −20%	54 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Far Cry 5	130−140 +39%	100−105 −39%
Forza Horizon 4	61 −138%	145 +138%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +40.4%	50−55 −40.4%
Metro Exodus	83 −3.6%	86 +3.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +36.8%	57 −36.8%
Valorant	156 +69.6%	90−95 −69.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +130%	20 −130%
Dota 2	62 +37.8%	45 −37.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +37.8%	45 −37.8%
Metro Exodus	37 −16.2%	43 +16.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 +42%	100−105 −42%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30 +50%	20−22 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	62 +37.8%	45 −37.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 +51.4%	35−40 −51.4%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +48.4%	30−35 −48.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	9 +50%	6−7 −50%
Dota 2	78 +41.8%	55−60 −41.8%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +50%	40−45 −50%
Fortnite	60−65 +50%	40−45 −50%
Forza Horizon 4	33 −155%	84 +155%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +50%	27−30 −50%
Valorant	89 +89.4%	45−50 −89.4%

This is how Radeon VII and Arc A750 compete in popular games:

Radeon VII is 13% faster in 1080p
Radeon VII is 34% faster in 1440p
Radeon VII is 61% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon VII is 130% faster.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A750 is 155% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon VII is ahead in 42 tests (75%)
Arc A750 is ahead in 12 tests (21%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	43.05	31.84
Recency	7 February 2019	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	225 Watt