Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX Vega M GL
9.33
+3.6%

Radeon RX Vega M GL outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs by 4% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking435445
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Value for money2.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 22Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years old)15 August 2020 (3 years old)
Current price$1307 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed931 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88no data
Floating-point performance2,588 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfaceIGPno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width1024 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−8.3%
26
+8.3%
1440p16−18
+0%
16
+0%
4K12−14
+0%
12
+0%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−57.9%
30
+57.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+35.7%
14
−35.7%

4K
High Preset

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−71.4%
12
+71.4%

This is how RX Vega M GL and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 8.3% faster than RX Vega M GL

1440p resolution:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 0% faster than RX Vega M GL

4K resolution:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 0% faster than RX Vega M GL

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega M GL is 35.7% faster than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 71.4% faster than the RX Vega M GL.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL is ahead in 1 test (33%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is ahead in 2 tests (67%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 9.33 9.01
Recency 1 February 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 28 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega M GL and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 18 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 755 votes

Rate Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.