Radeon Pro 5300M vs RX Vega 64

Place in performance ranking	116	322
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	55.15	3.75
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Vega	Navi 14
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	14 August 2017 (6 years ago)	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$125 (0.3x MSRP)	$2068

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 64 has 1371% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4096	1280
Core clock speed	1630 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1546 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	395.8	100.0
Floating-point performance	13,353 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega 64 and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	279 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	945 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	483.8 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 64 37.18
+141%

Pro 5300M 15.45

RX Vega 64 outperforms Pro 5300M by 141% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 64 14358
+141%

Pro 5300M 5966

RX Vega 64 outperforms Pro 5300M by 141% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	116 +158%	45−50 −158%
1440p	75 +150%	30−35 −150%
4K	47 +161%	18−20 −161%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70

no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	81	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	83	no data
Battlefield 5	186	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	68	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	112	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	108	no data
Forza Horizon 4	167	no data
Hitman 3	84	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	167	no data
Metro Exodus	144	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	116	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	202	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	100	no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	69	no data
Battlefield 5	170	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	86	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	93	no data
Forza Horizon 4	294	no data
Hitman 3	77	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	293	no data
Metro Exodus	116	no data
Red Dead Redemption 2	103	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	164	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	132	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	247	no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	51	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	54	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70	no data
Far Cry 5	67	no data
Forza Horizon 4	128	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	100	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	143	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	54	no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	93	no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	47	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	69	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30	no data
Far Cry 5	81	no data
Forza Horizon 4	98	no data
Hitman 3	50	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	80	no data
Metro Exodus	79	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	38	no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	59	no data
Far Cry New Dawn	36	no data
Hitman 3	38	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50	no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32	no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	48	no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29	no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	28	no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	25	no data
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14	no data
Far Cry 5	27	no data
Forza Horizon 4	66	no data
Horizon Zero Dawn	52	no data
Metro Exodus	45	no data
Watch Dogs: Legion	21	no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

no data

This is how RX Vega 64 and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

RX Vega 64 is 158% faster in 1080p
RX Vega 64 is 150% faster in 1440p
RX Vega 64 is 161% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	37.18	15.45
Recency	14 August 2017	13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	295 Watt	65 Watt