GeForce GTS 250 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 11 and GeForce GTS 250, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 11
2018
35 Watt
5.49
+256%

RX Vega 11 outperforms GTS 250 by a whopping 256% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking609973
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.08
Power efficiency10.820.71
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRavenG92B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)4 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores704128
Core clock speed300 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed1251 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,940 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt150 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate55.0444.93
Floating-point processing power1.761 TFLOPS0.3871 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs4464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1100 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data70.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentTwo Dual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)4.0
OpenGL4.63.0
OpenCL2.11.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.49
+256%
GTS 250 1.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX Vega 11 2109
+256%
GTS 250 592

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD28
+300%
7−8
−300%
1440p5
+400%
1−2
−400%
4K12
+300%
3−4
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data28.43
1440pno data199.00
4Kno data66.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Elden Ring 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+300%
5−6
−300%
Metro Exodus 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Dota 2 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Elden Ring 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 30
+275%
8−9
−275%
Fortnite 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Metro Exodus 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 54
+286%
14−16
−286%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
World of Tanks 85−90
+267%
24−27
−267%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Dota 2 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+271%
7−8
−271%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+283%
12−14
−283%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Elden Ring 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
World of Tanks 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Valorant 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Elden Ring 3−4 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 17
+325%
4−5
−325%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Fortnite 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

This is how RX Vega 11 and GTS 250 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega 11 is 300% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega 11 is 400% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega 11 is 300% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.49 1.54
Recency 10 May 2018 4 March 2009
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 150 Watt

RX Vega 11 has a 256.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 11 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTS 250 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
Radeon RX Vega 11
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GeForce GTS 250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 1816 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1680 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.