Radeon RX 7600 vs RX 7700S

Place in the ranking	108	85
Place by popularity	not in top-100	74
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	93.24
Power efficiency	27.43	18.06
Architecture	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 33	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)	24 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$269

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2048
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	1720 MHz
Boost clock speed	2500 MHz	2655 MHz
Number of transistors	13,300 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	165 Watt
Texture fill rate	320.0	339.8
Floating-point processing power	20.48 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	128
Ray Tracing Cores	32	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	204 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700S 39.77

RX 7600 43.20
+8.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 7700S 15287

RX 7600 16605
+8.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 7700S 37918

RX 7600 43430
+14.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 7700S 24246

RX 7600 32404
+33.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120 −19.2%	143 +19.2%
1440p	61 −9.8%	67 +9.8%
4K	50 +35.1%	37 −35.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	1.88
1440p	no data	4.01
4K	no data	7.27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	88 −53.4%	135 +53.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −74.1%	148 +74.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Counter-Strike 2	81 −33.3%	108 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +44.1%	59 −44.1%
Forza Horizon 4	202 −40.6%	284 +40.6%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −69.5%	161 +69.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 −6.4%	80−85 +6.4%
Valorant	150−160 −9.4%	170−180 +9.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Counter-Strike 2	68 −32.4%	90 +32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +70%	50 −70%
Dota 2	89 −68.5%	150 +68.5%
Far Cry 5	65 −55.4%	100−110 +55.4%
Fortnite	170−180 −5.8%	180−190 +5.8%
Forza Horizon 4	167 −37.7%	230 +37.7%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	133 −12.8%	150 +12.8%
Metro Exodus	95−100 −25.3%	119 +25.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −2.5%	200−210 +2.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 −6.4%	80−85 +6.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 −10.6%	150−160 +10.6%
Valorant	150−160 −9.4%	170−180 +9.4%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 −3.8%	100−110 +3.8%
Counter-Strike 2	61 −32.8%	81 +32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +88.9%	45 −88.9%
Dota 2	120−130 −4.8%	130−140 +4.8%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −3.1%	100−110 +3.1%
Forza Horizon 4	144 −38.2%	199 +38.2%
Forza Horizon 5	100−110 −7.8%	110−120 +7.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 −2.5%	200−210 +2.5%
Valorant	150−160 −9.4%	170−180 +9.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	67 −14.9%	77 +14.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	67 −14.9%	77 +14.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −10%	40−45 +10%
World of Tanks	250−260 −8.3%	270−280 +8.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −5.5%	75−80 +5.5%
Counter-Strike 2	37 −37.8%	51 +37.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +42.9%	28 −42.9%
Far Cry 5	120−130 −7.8%	130−140 +7.8%
Forza Horizon 4	92 −40.2%	129 +40.2%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 −10.6%	70−75 +10.6%
Metro Exodus	85−90 −37.2%	118 +37.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −22.9%	86 +22.9%
Valorant	120−130 −11.9%	140−150 +11.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +86.4%	22 −86.4%
Dota 2	68 −20.6%	82 +20.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	68 −20.6%	82 +20.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −15.2%	38 +15.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 −10.1%	140−150 +10.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 −20.6%	82 +20.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −10.9%	50−55 +10.9%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 −12.2%	45−50 +12.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 +50%	12 −50%
Dota 2	75−80 −7.6%	85−90 +7.6%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −11.9%	65−70 +11.9%
Fortnite	55−60 −12.3%	60−65 +12.3%
Forza Horizon 4	48 −43.8%	69 +43.8%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 −13.5%	40−45 +13.5%
Valorant	65−70 −15.2%	75−80 +15.2%

This is how RX 7700S and RX 7600 compete in popular games:

RX 7600 is 19% faster in 1080p
RX 7600 is 10% faster in 1440p
RX 7700S is 35% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7700S is 89% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7600 is 74% faster.

All in all, in popular games: