Radeon PRO W7900 vs RX 7700 XT

Place in performance ranking	33	11
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	40.63	7.46
Architecture	RDNA 3	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Navi 32	Navi 31
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)	13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$449	$3,999
Current price	$443 (1x MSRP)	$4649 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 445% better value for money than PRO W7900.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3456	6144
Core clock speed	1700 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2544 MHz	2495 MHz
Number of transistors	28,100 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	295 Watt
Texture fill rate	549.5	958.1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	280 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	48 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	18000 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	864.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C	3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7700 XT 57.30

PRO W7900 75.55
+31.8%

PRO W7900 outperforms RX 7700 XT by 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7700 XT 22152

PRO W7900 29205
+31.8%

PRO W7900 outperforms RX 7700 XT by 32% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	182 −26.4%	230−240 +26.4%
1440p	102 −27.5%	130−140 +27.5%
4K	59 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

193

−29.5%

250−260
+29.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	165 −27.3%	210−220 +27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	180 −27.8%	230−240 +27.8%
Battlefield 5	180−190 −26.4%	230−240 +26.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −30.1%	160−170 +30.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	158 −26.6%	200−210 +26.6%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −22.4%	120−130 +22.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −26%	160−170 +26%
Forza Horizon 4	278 −25.9%	350−400 +25.9%
Hitman 3	130−140 −25%	170−180 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	391 −27.9%	500−550 +27.9%
Metro Exodus	120−130 −30.1%	160−170 +30.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	398 −25.6%	500−550 +25.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −28.7%	130−140 +28.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	148 −28.4%	190−200 +28.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	149 −27.5%	190−200 +27.5%
Battlefield 5	180−190 −26.4%	230−240 +26.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −30.1%	160−170 +30.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	132 −28.8%	170−180 +28.8%
Far Cry 5	100 −30%	130−140 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	76 −31.6%	100−105 +31.6%
Forza Horizon 4	272 −28.7%	350−400 +28.7%
Hitman 3	130−140 −25%	170−180 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	322 −24.2%	400−450 +24.2%
Metro Exodus	151 −25.8%	190−200 +25.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −28.2%	150−160 +28.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	264 −13.6%	300−310 +13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	295 −18.6%	350−400 +18.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −28.7%	130−140 +28.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	121 −24%	150−160 +24%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	132 −28.8%	170−180 +28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 −30.1%	160−170 +30.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	122 −31.1%	160−170 +31.1%
Far Cry 5	95−100 −22.4%	120−130 +22.4%
Forza Horizon 4	231 −29.9%	300−310 +29.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	216 −29.6%	280−290 +29.6%
Metro Exodus	136 −25%	170−180 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	168 −31%	220−230 +31%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 −28.7%	130−140 +28.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−28.2%

150−160
+28.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 −30.1%	160−170 +30.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −28.8%	170−180 +28.8%
Hitman 3	70−75 −28.6%	90−95 +28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −30%	65−70 +30%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	98 −22.4%	120−130 +22.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	101 −28.7%	130−140 +28.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 −20.9%	110−120 +20.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 −25%	100−105 +25%
Far Cry 5	157 −27.4%	200−210 +27.4%
Forza Horizon 4	197 −26.9%	250−260 +26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	171 −28.7%	220−230 +28.7%
Metro Exodus	134 −26.9%	170−180 +26.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	193 −29.5%	250−260 +29.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	120 −25%	150−160 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	69 −30.4%	90−95 +30.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −20.5%	100−105 +20.5%
Hitman 3	45−50 −25%	60−65 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −22%	100−105 +22%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	66 −28.8%	85−90 +28.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 −29.3%	75−80 +29.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	59 −27.1%	75−80 +27.1%
Battlefield 5	70−75 −26.8%	90−95 +26.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −31.1%	80−85 +31.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 −25%	45−50 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	134 −26.9%	170−180 +26.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	103 −26.2%	130−140 +26.2%
Metro Exodus	89 −23.6%	110−120 +23.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −17.6%	40−45 +17.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60

−25%

70−75
+25%

This is how RX 7700 XT and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

PRO W7900 is 26% faster in 1080p
PRO W7900 is 27% faster in 1440p
PRO W7900 is 27% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	57.30	75.55
Recency	25 August 2023	13 April 2023
Cost	$449	$3999
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	48 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	295 Watt