Radeon PRO W7700 vs RX 7900 GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

RX 7900 GRE
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
68.97
+31.6%

RX 7900 GRE outperforms PRO W7700 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking2145
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation28.9423.95
ArchitectureRDNA 3RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code nameNavi 31Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date27 July 2023 (less than a year ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$723 $999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 GRE has 21% better value for money than PRO W7700.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203072
Boost clock speed2245 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors57,700 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)260 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate718.4499.2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length276 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.22.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 7900 GRE 68.97
+31.6%
PRO W7700 52.40

RX 7900 GRE outperforms PRO W7700 by 32% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 7900 GRE 26672
+31.6%
PRO W7700 20263

RX 7900 GRE outperforms PRO W7700 by 32% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD203
+35.3%
150−160
−35.3%
1440p128
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
4K78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 208
+38.7%
150−160
−38.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+38.1%
160−170
−38.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150
+43%
100−105
−43%
Cyberpunk 2077 184
+41.5%
130−140
−41.5%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+41%
100−105
−41%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+35.3%
150−160
−35.3%
Hitman 3 140−150
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 446
+48.7%
300−310
−48.7%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+32%
100−105
−32%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 487
+39.1%
350−400
−39.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+38.1%
160−170
−38.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150
+43%
100−105
−43%
Cyberpunk 2077 158
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Far Cry 5 100
+33.3%
75−80
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
+42%
50−55
−42%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+35.3%
150−160
−35.3%
Hitman 3 140−150
+35.5%
110−120
−35.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 417
+39%
300−310
−39%
Metro Exodus 142
+42%
100−105
−42%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 310
+34.8%
230−240
−34.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 382
+31.7%
290−300
−31.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−110
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+34.4%
90−95
−34.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 140−150
+43%
100−105
−43%
Cyberpunk 2077 148
+34.5%
110−120
−34.5%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+35%
80−85
−35%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+35.3%
150−160
−35.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 294
+33.6%
220−230
−33.6%
Metro Exodus 128
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 209
+39.3%
150−160
−39.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
+38.8%
85−90
−38.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+37.8%
90−95
−37.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+37.5%
120−130
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 140−150
+44%
100−105
−44%
Hitman 3 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+32%
50−55
−32%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+40%
55−60
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+32.3%
65−70
−32.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−110
+40%
75−80
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+40%
70−75
−40%
Far Cry 5 154
+40%
110−120
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+38.3%
120−130
−38.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 231
+35.9%
170−180
−35.9%
Metro Exodus 128
+34.7%
95−100
−34.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 252
+32.6%
190−200
−32.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+41.8%
110−120
−41.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 76
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 100−110
+36.3%
80−85
−36.3%
Hitman 3 60−65
+33.3%
45−50
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+32.5%
80−85
−32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 87
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125
+38.9%
90−95
−38.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+35%
40−45
−35%
Battlefield 5 90−95
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+32.2%
90−95
−32.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 140
+40%
100−105
−40%
Metro Exodus 109
+36.3%
80−85
−36.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%

This is how RX 7900 GRE and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 35% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 35% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 GRE is 42% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 68.97 52.40
Recency 27 July 2023 13 November 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 260 Watt 190 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO W7700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE
Radeon RX 7900 GRE
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 342 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.