Radeon Instinct MI325X vs Data Center GPU Max NEXT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameRialto BridgeAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data2024 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048019456
Core clock speedno data1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors100,000 million153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate2,0482,554
Floating-point processing powerno data81.72 TFLOPS
TMUs12801216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthOAM ModuleOAM Module
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eHBM3e
Maximum RAM amount128 GB288 GB
Memory bus width8192 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed3.1 GB/s2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth3,205 GB/s10.3 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.6N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 GB 288 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 750 Watt

Instinct MI325X has a 125% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Data Center GPU Max NEXT and Radeon Instinct MI325X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Data Center GPU Max NEXT is a desktop card while Radeon Instinct MI325X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X
Radeon Instinct MI325X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 63 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 26 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI325X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.