Radeon RX 7700 XT vs RX 6950 XT

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RX 6950 XT
2022
16384 MB GDDR6
73.21
+29.7%

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 7700 XT by 30% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation22.2839.57
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)RDNA 3
GPU code nameNaviNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date10 May 2022 (1 year ago)25 August 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,099 $449
Current price$961 (0.9x MSRP)$443 (1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 78% better value for money than RX 6950 XT.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203456
Core clock speed1925 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed2324 MHz2544 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)335 Watt245 Watt
Texture fill rate743.7549.5

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width3-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin2x 8-pin

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed18000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.2
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6950 XT 73.21
+29.7%
RX 7700 XT 56.43

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 7700 XT by 30% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 6950 XT 28340
+29.7%
RX 7700 XT 21843

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 7700 XT by 30% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6950 XT 119918
RX 7700 XT 126733
+5.7%

RX 7700 XT outperforms RX 6950 XT by 6% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6950 XT 72228
+26%
RX 7700 XT 57340

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 7700 XT by 26% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6950 XT 59882
+39.9%
RX 7700 XT 42801

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 7700 XT by 40% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6950 XT 229172
+13.5%
RX 7700 XT 201871

RX 6950 XT outperforms RX 7700 XT by 14% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 6950 XT 497297
RX 7700 XT 730434
+46.9%

RX 7700 XT outperforms RX 6950 XT by 47% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD220
+18.3%
186
−18.3%
1440p139
+36.3%
102
−36.3%
4K88
+49.2%
59
−49.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 161
−19.9%
193
+19.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−48.6%
165
+48.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−39.5%
180
+39.5%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+14.1%
140−150
−14.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 170−180
+16.6%
150−160
−16.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
−10.5%
158
+10.5%
Far Cry 5 181
−3.9%
188
+3.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 152
−3.3%
157
+3.3%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−35%
278
+35%
Hitman 3 210−220
+18.4%
170−180
−18.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+30.9%
120−130
−30.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+33.7%
90−95
−33.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 276
+14%
242
−14%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
+31.3%
95−100
−31.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−33.3%
148
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−15.5%
149
+15.5%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+14.1%
140−150
−14.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 170−180
+16.6%
150−160
−16.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
−3.1%
132
+3.1%
Far Cry 5 173
−4.6%
181
+4.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 147
−2.7%
151
+2.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−32%
272
+32%
Hitman 3 210−220
+18.4%
170−180
−18.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+30.9%
120−130
−30.9%
Metro Exodus 189
+24.3%
152
−24.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+33.7%
90−95
−33.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 257
+23%
209
−23%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 376
+27.5%
295
−27.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 115
+16.2%
95−100
−16.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 110−120
−9%
121
+9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
−2.3%
132
+2.3%
Battlefield 5 160−170
+14.1%
140−150
−14.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 164
−1.8%
167
+1.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 132
−3%
136
+3%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
−12.1%
231
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 216
+28.6%
168
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 107
+8.1%
95−100
−8.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 130−140
+34%
100−105
−34%
Hitman 3 160−170
+41%
110−120
−41%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+42%
85−90
−42%
Metro Exodus 120
+33.3%
90
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+44%
50−55
−44%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 187
+41.7%
132
−41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
−19.5%
98
+19.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90−95
−8.6%
101
+8.6%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+26.6%
100−110
−26.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
+16.3%
80
−16.3%
Far Cry 5 163
+3.8%
157
−3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 132
−1.5%
134
+1.5%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−13.2%
197
+13.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+14.2%
120
−14.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 103
+80.7%
55−60
−80.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+40.7%
55−60
−40.7%
Hitman 3 95−100
+50%
60−65
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+55.6%
50−55
−55.6%
Metro Exodus 77
+35.1%
57
−35.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+50%
30−35
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 99
+50%
66
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 144
+61.8%
89
−61.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+1.7%
58
−1.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+0%
59
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+38.6%
70−75
−38.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+27.8%
36
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 124
+51.2%
82
−51.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 118
+32.6%
89
−32.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−3.9%
134
+3.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65
+103%
30−35
−103%

This is how RX 6950 XT and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is 18.3% faster than RX 7700 XT in 1080p
  • RX 6950 XT is 36.3% faster than RX 7700 XT in 1440p
  • RX 6950 XT is 49.2% faster than RX 7700 XT in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6950 XT is 103% faster than the RX 7700 XT.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 48.6% faster than the RX 6950 XT.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6950 XT is ahead in 43 tests (63%)
  • RX 7700 XT is ahead in 23 tests (34%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 73.21 56.43
Recency 10 May 2022 25 August 2023
Cost $1099 $449
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 335 Watt 245 Watt

The Radeon RX 6950 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7700 XT in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
Radeon RX 6950 XT
AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Radeon RX 7700 XT

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2560 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 840 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.