Radeon RX 7700 XT vs RX 6800 XT

Place in the ranking	28	39
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	50.65	71.44
Power efficiency	14.96	16.47
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 21	Navi 32
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$649	$449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7700 XT has 41% better value for money than RX 6800 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	3456
Core clock speed	1825 MHz	1435 MHz
Boost clock speed	2250 MHz	2544 MHz
Number of transistors	26,800 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	648.0	549.5
Floating-point processing power	20.74 TFLOPS	35.17 TFLOPS
ROPs	128	96
TMUs	288	216
Ray Tracing Cores	72	54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800 XT 65.04
+11.2%

RX 7700 XT 58.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6800 XT 25008
+11.2%

RX 7700 XT 22490

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6800 XT 52046

RX 7700 XT 57340
+10.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6800 XT 96516

RX 7700 XT 126733
+31.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6800 XT 49735
+16.2%

RX 7700 XT 42801

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6800 XT 193053

RX 7700 XT 201871
+4.6%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6800 XT 504438

RX 7700 XT 730434
+44.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	203 +8%	188 −8%
1440p	145 +40.8%	103 −40.8%
4K	100 +66.7%	60 −66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.20 −33.9%	2.39 +33.9%
1440p	4.48 −2.7%	4.36 +2.7%
4K	6.49 +15.3%	7.48 −15.3%

RX 7700 XT has 34% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RX 6800 XT and RX 7700 XT have nearly equal cost per frame in 1440p
RX 6800 XT has 15% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	150−160 −15%	176 +15%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 −29.5%	193 +29.5%
Elden Ring	240−250 +29.2%	192 −29.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +5.5%	145 −5.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +88.6%	79 −88.6%
Forza Horizon 4	404 +1.5%	398 −1.5%
Metro Exodus	127 −23.6%	157 +23.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 +14%	100−110 −14%
Valorant	401 +54.2%	260−270 −54.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +26.4%	121 −26.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +126%	66 −126%
Dota 2	155 −7.1%	166 +7.1%
Elden Ring	240−250 +13.2%	210−220 −13.2%
Far Cry 5	58 −72.4%	100 +72.4%
Fortnite	250−260 +10.9%	230−240 −10.9%
Forza Horizon 4	355 +6.3%	334 −6.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	150 −10.7%	166 +10.7%
Metro Exodus	120 −10%	132 +10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	129 +20.6%	100−110 −20.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Valorant	173 −50.3%	260−270 +50.3%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	150−160 +39.1%	110 −39.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	140−150 +144%	61 −144%
Dota 2	145 +11.5%	130−140 −11.5%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +6.8%	110−120 −6.8%
Forza Horizon 4	302 +5.2%	287 −5.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	210−220 +0%	210−220 +0%
Valorant	356 +36.9%	260−270 −36.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	120 +14.3%	105 −14.3%
Elden Ring	160−170 +17%	140−150 −17%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 +14.3%	105 −14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	83 +23.9%	65−70 −23.9%
World of Tanks	400−450 +15.4%	350−400 −15.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +15.1%	73 −15.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +110%	40 −110%
Far Cry 5	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	222 +15%	193 −15%
Metro Exodus	112 −19.6%	134 +19.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +16.7%	120 −16.7%
Valorant	278 +23%	220−230 −23%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +155%	31 −155%
Dota 2	134 +19.6%	112 −19.6%
Elden Ring	85−90 +20.8%	70−75 −20.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	134 +19.6%	112 −19.6%
Metro Exodus	56 −1.8%	57 +1.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +1%	200−210 −1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +20.5%	40−45 −20.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	134 +19.6%	112 −19.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +13.5%	70−75 −13.5%
Counter-Strike 2	75−80 +16.2%	65−70 −16.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +122%	18 −122%
Dota 2	122 +22%	100−105 −22%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	133 +37.1%	97 −37.1%
Valorant	153 +20.5%	120−130 −20.5%

This is how RX 6800 XT and RX 7700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 8% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 41% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 155% faster.
in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 7700 XT is 72% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is ahead in 39 tests (64%)
RX 7700 XT is ahead in 10 tests (16%)
there's a draw in 12 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	65.04	58.49
Recency	28 October 2020	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	245 Watt