RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

Place in the ranking	47	29
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	51.73	no data
Power efficiency	14.92	34.04
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 22	AD104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)	9 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$549	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	6144
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2175 MHz
Number of transistors	17,200 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	130 Watt
Texture fill rate	416.0	417.6
Floating-point processing power	13.31 TFLOPS	26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	80
TMUs	160	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	40	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	245 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	20 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6750 XT 53.96

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 64.02
+18.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20816

RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24696
+18.6%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	165 −15.2%	190−200 +15.2%
1440p	88 −13.6%	100−110 +13.6%
4K	51 −17.6%	60−65 +17.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.33	no data
1440p	6.24	no data
4K	10.76	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

165

−15.2%

190−200
+15.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −17%	110−120 +17%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −17%	200−210 +17%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	127 −18.1%	150−160 +18.1%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −15.4%	150−160 +15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −14.2%	250−260 +14.2%
Hitman 3	110−120 −15%	130−140 +15%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −15.4%	240−250 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	150−160 −13.3%	170−180 +13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −17.9%	250−260 +17.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −18.1%	170−180 +18.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −17%	110−120 +17%
Battlefield 5	170−180 −17%	200−210 +17%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	109 −10.1%	120−130 +10.1%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	130−140 −15.4%	150−160 +15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −14.2%	250−260 +14.2%
Hitman 3	110−120 −15%	130−140 +15%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −15.4%	240−250 +15.4%
Metro Exodus	150−160 −13.3%	170−180 +13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −17.1%	130−140 +17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	304 −15.1%	350−400 +15.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 −18.1%	170−180 +18.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −17%	110−120 +17%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −15.4%	120−130 +15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	98 −12.2%	110−120 +12.2%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −14.3%	120−130 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −14.2%	250−260 +14.2%
Hitman 3	110−120 −15%	130−140 +15%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210 −14.3%	240−250 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	260 −15.4%	300−310 +15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	135 −18.5%	160−170 +18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	98 −12.2%	110−120 +12.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−17.1%

130−140
+17.1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −16.1%	130−140 +16.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −14.5%	95−100 +14.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −14.8%	70−75 +14.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −17.2%	75−80 +17.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −17.2%	75−80 +17.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	60 −16.7%	70−75 +16.7%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −11.1%	70−75 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 −12.8%	300−310 +12.8%
Hitman 3	75−80 −13.3%	85−90 +13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	158 −13.9%	180−190 +13.9%
Metro Exodus	126 −11.1%	140−150 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	186 −18.3%	220−230 +18.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −13.6%	100−105 +13.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	220−230 −16.1%	260−270 +16.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95
−8.7%

100−105

+8.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −10%	55−60 +10%
Hitman 3	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 −17.4%	250−260 +17.4%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −18.4%	90−95 +18.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	79 −13.9%	90−95 +13.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −12.5%	45−50 +12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −18.4%	45−50 +18.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	26 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −14.3%	40−45 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −12.5%	90−95 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	99 −11.1%	110−120 +11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	41 −9.8%	45−50 +9.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−15.4%

60−65
+15.4%

This is how RX 6750 XT and RTX 4000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 15% faster in 1080p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 14% faster in 1440p
RTX 4000 Ada Generation is 18% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	53.96	64.02
Recency	3 March 2022	9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	20 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	130 Watt

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 18.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 92.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6750 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.